Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offseasons in the Fox Era


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Taking a look at the history and results purely from a numbers standpoint...

2002:

3 UFAs signed, 4 lost

9 draft picks, 5 make the squad

1 trade (Al Wallace)

7-9 record, no playoffs

2003:

5 UFAs signed, 2 lost

8 draft picks, 6 make the squad

0 trades

11-5 season, Super Bowl appearance

2004:

3 UFAs signed, 6 lost

7 draft picks, all make the squad

2 trades (Todd Fordham and Javier Collins)

7-9 record, no playoffs

2005:

5 UFAs signed, 2 lost

10 draft picks, 7 make the squad

2 trades (Jason Baker, Rod Gardner)

11-5 record, NFC Championship appearance

2006:

6 UFAs signed, 7 lost

8 draft picks, all make the squad

0 trades

8-8 record, no playoffs

2007:

1 UFA signed (Deke Cooper, Carr was cut and picked up), 3 lost

8 draft picks, all make the squad

1 trade (Chris Harris)

7-9 record, no playoffs

2008:

8 UFAs signed, 4 lost

9 draft picks, 8 make the squad

2 trades (Josh McCown, Kris Jenkins traded for picks)

12-4 season, lost first playoff game

2009:

0 UFAs signed (all vet pickups were cuts), 5 lost

7 draft picks, all make the squad

3 trades (JJ Jansen, Louis Leonard, Tank Tyler)

8-8 record, no playoffs

Info Sources:

Free Agent History

Draft History

Trade History

Worth noting that in the Fox era, only one time has the team traded a player solely for picks, that being the Kris Jenkins trade. It's mostly player for player or picks for a player.

I started this off as a comparison of this offseason with the 2002 and 2003 offseasons when Fox was just starting to build the team, but for now all I've been able to look at was raw numbers. The team's history pages don't have easy tracking for players picked up (or lost) from cuts, waivers, etc. I'll have to look for another source on that.

I'll have to go deeper on it later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...