Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Divisional Playoff Prediction Thread


Kevin Greene

Recommended Posts

Here's what MSNBC has to say:

When Cardinals have the ball...

In the Wild-Card round, Arizona caught the Falcons flat-footed by running it with Edgerrin James early and often. He ran the ball 16 times for 73 yards — a Csonkian output by normal Arizona standards.

Meanwhile, the Cardinals eventually got to the place they like to be — the air — and got Larry Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin involved to pace their win. But the Panthers have a better run defense than Atlanta (marginally) and, with Jon Beason and Julius Peppers have two real game-changers.

The injury to Anquan Boldin’s hamstring will be worth monitoring as the week goes on because that receiver can tear up a defense and he brings an attitude of toughness Arizona will need.

When Panthers have the ball...

The Panthers running game has been devastating this season and Arizona — despite its work holding down a puzzlingly punchless Michael Turner — were 28th in rushing yards per play this year. DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart keep Jake Delhomme from getting too (ahem) inventive and the wondrous Steve Smith is worth a big play or three in every game. Did the Cardinals just surprise Atlanta? Or are they suddenly a defense to be reckoned with?

The lowdown

The Cardinals won a playoff game after deciding to actually play hard. Yay. Now, will they be interested in playing hard after taking a plane trip East?

On Oct. 26, the Cardinals seemed interested, jumping to a 17-3 lead over the Panthers. But it didn’t last. They allowed 21 third quarter points and lost 27-23. Joking aside, the Cardinals must be taken seriously. But the more balanced, consistent, dependable team has the edge in this one. And that’s Carolina.

And this...

The Giants fought hard this year to compile the NFC's best record. There was more than bragging rights at stake. Along with it came a first-round bye, home-field advantage through the playoffs and the chance to play the lowest-seeded opponent in the second round.

The second-round opponent turns out to be the Eagles. The Giants must wonder if it was worth all the effort. If they’d only had the sense to lose to the Panthers when those two teams played for the top seed, the Giants would be looking at the Cardinals next weekend instead of their divisional rivals.

This is one of the bad jokes of playoff rules. The Eagles are a better team than Arizona, which made the playoffs with an 8-8 record. But the Eagles are a wild card, and thus they’re considered to be a lesser opponent than a division champion, so the Giants get them while Carolina gets to host the Cards.

So much for the rewards for winning.

But what’s tough luck for a team is good news for fans. Had the Vikings won, the second round of the NFC playoffs would have lacked drama. Panthers-Vikes and Giants-Cardinals aren’t games that get the adrenaline pumping.

But Giants-Eagles is a matchup made for the playoffs. It’s the game that saves the second round from terminal predictability, a game to plan a weekend around, the NFC’s answer to the Titans-Ravens epic collision being provided by the AFC.

Cards-Panthers remains a snooze. Arizona played maybe its most complete game of the season on Saturday, but don't bet on it happening again against the Panthers. Carolina won’t show Kurt Warner as much respect as Atlanta’s non-existent pass rushers did.

Even playing at their best, the Cards don’t have the arsenal to beat the league’s best teams. They put the heat on rookie quarterback Matt Ryan and finally made him show his age. And their offensive line protected Warner like the Hope Diamond.

Now they face a veteran quarterback, Jake Delhomme, and a defensive front that will make Warner scramble and probably put the ball on the ground. The Panthers will also run against Arizona — they run against everybody. The game should be over by halftime, if not sooner.

That won’t be the case with Giants-Eagles, a game we’ve seen before. The Giants won three more games than did the Eagles this year, but any NFC East fan will tell you that’s meaningless. These two ancient rivals, separated by less than 100 miles of the N.J. Turnpike, split their two games this year. Their records say the Giants are better. The reality is either team can win.

You figure the Giants will win and advance to an NFC Championship against the Panthers. But you can’t be sure of it. These are the Eagles, and they know how to beat New York. They’re the wild-card team nobody, including the Giants, wants to face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went 3-1 on last week's picks (thought indy would beat the chargers)

This week i'll go with:

Carolina

Philly

Baltimore

Pittsburgh

If I'm right, that is 2 GREAT title games:

Panthers-Eagles rematch and a third meeting between the Ravens and Steelers (what a bloodbath that would be)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i will stick to my picks

Panthers over Cardinals

Eagles over Giants

Titans over Ravens

Steelers over Chargers

and im still hoping to see titans/panthers superbowl, ive been calling for it since titans clinched #1 seed, but might be a little biased cuz i have always been big on kerry collins, i still got like all his damn rookie cards somewhere downstairs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panthers

Iggles

Titans

Steelers

We have any doubters on the Cats game? Didn't think so.

The only reason why i think the Iggles will win this game is because of Manning. If they can get preesure on him and force bad throws, the Iggies will make them pay.

Ravens offense really isn't that good. While Flacco made good throws at times, many were crazy passes and off the mark completely. Titans D will thrive on any mistakes the Ravens make.

I don't see the Bolts getting through Pittsburgh. I also didn't see them beating Indy, so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...