Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Divisional Playoff Prediction Thread


Kevin Greene

Recommended Posts

Here's what MSNBC has to say:

When Cardinals have the ball...

In the Wild-Card round, Arizona caught the Falcons flat-footed by running it with Edgerrin James early and often. He ran the ball 16 times for 73 yards — a Csonkian output by normal Arizona standards.

Meanwhile, the Cardinals eventually got to the place they like to be — the air — and got Larry Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin involved to pace their win. But the Panthers have a better run defense than Atlanta (marginally) and, with Jon Beason and Julius Peppers have two real game-changers.

The injury to Anquan Boldin’s hamstring will be worth monitoring as the week goes on because that receiver can tear up a defense and he brings an attitude of toughness Arizona will need.

When Panthers have the ball...

The Panthers running game has been devastating this season and Arizona — despite its work holding down a puzzlingly punchless Michael Turner — were 28th in rushing yards per play this year. DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart keep Jake Delhomme from getting too (ahem) inventive and the wondrous Steve Smith is worth a big play or three in every game. Did the Cardinals just surprise Atlanta? Or are they suddenly a defense to be reckoned with?

The lowdown

The Cardinals won a playoff game after deciding to actually play hard. Yay. Now, will they be interested in playing hard after taking a plane trip East?

On Oct. 26, the Cardinals seemed interested, jumping to a 17-3 lead over the Panthers. But it didn’t last. They allowed 21 third quarter points and lost 27-23. Joking aside, the Cardinals must be taken seriously. But the more balanced, consistent, dependable team has the edge in this one. And that’s Carolina.

And this...

The Giants fought hard this year to compile the NFC's best record. There was more than bragging rights at stake. Along with it came a first-round bye, home-field advantage through the playoffs and the chance to play the lowest-seeded opponent in the second round.

The second-round opponent turns out to be the Eagles. The Giants must wonder if it was worth all the effort. If they’d only had the sense to lose to the Panthers when those two teams played for the top seed, the Giants would be looking at the Cardinals next weekend instead of their divisional rivals.

This is one of the bad jokes of playoff rules. The Eagles are a better team than Arizona, which made the playoffs with an 8-8 record. But the Eagles are a wild card, and thus they’re considered to be a lesser opponent than a division champion, so the Giants get them while Carolina gets to host the Cards.

So much for the rewards for winning.

But what’s tough luck for a team is good news for fans. Had the Vikings won, the second round of the NFC playoffs would have lacked drama. Panthers-Vikes and Giants-Cardinals aren’t games that get the adrenaline pumping.

But Giants-Eagles is a matchup made for the playoffs. It’s the game that saves the second round from terminal predictability, a game to plan a weekend around, the NFC’s answer to the Titans-Ravens epic collision being provided by the AFC.

Cards-Panthers remains a snooze. Arizona played maybe its most complete game of the season on Saturday, but don't bet on it happening again against the Panthers. Carolina won’t show Kurt Warner as much respect as Atlanta’s non-existent pass rushers did.

Even playing at their best, the Cards don’t have the arsenal to beat the league’s best teams. They put the heat on rookie quarterback Matt Ryan and finally made him show his age. And their offensive line protected Warner like the Hope Diamond.

Now they face a veteran quarterback, Jake Delhomme, and a defensive front that will make Warner scramble and probably put the ball on the ground. The Panthers will also run against Arizona — they run against everybody. The game should be over by halftime, if not sooner.

That won’t be the case with Giants-Eagles, a game we’ve seen before. The Giants won three more games than did the Eagles this year, but any NFC East fan will tell you that’s meaningless. These two ancient rivals, separated by less than 100 miles of the N.J. Turnpike, split their two games this year. Their records say the Giants are better. The reality is either team can win.

You figure the Giants will win and advance to an NFC Championship against the Panthers. But you can’t be sure of it. These are the Eagles, and they know how to beat New York. They’re the wild-card team nobody, including the Giants, wants to face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went 3-1 on last week's picks (thought indy would beat the chargers)

This week i'll go with:

Carolina

Philly

Baltimore

Pittsburgh

If I'm right, that is 2 GREAT title games:

Panthers-Eagles rematch and a third meeting between the Ravens and Steelers (what a bloodbath that would be)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i will stick to my picks

Panthers over Cardinals

Eagles over Giants

Titans over Ravens

Steelers over Chargers

and im still hoping to see titans/panthers superbowl, ive been calling for it since titans clinched #1 seed, but might be a little biased cuz i have always been big on kerry collins, i still got like all his damn rookie cards somewhere downstairs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panthers

Iggles

Titans

Steelers

We have any doubters on the Cats game? Didn't think so.

The only reason why i think the Iggles will win this game is because of Manning. If they can get preesure on him and force bad throws, the Iggies will make them pay.

Ravens offense really isn't that good. While Flacco made good throws at times, many were crazy passes and off the mark completely. Titans D will thrive on any mistakes the Ravens make.

I don't see the Bolts getting through Pittsburgh. I also didn't see them beating Indy, so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I want the following: LB - Devin Lloyd (our big money splash) I'm also interested in Nakobe Dean if we go the cheaper route. His size is a concern beside Wallace, but Dean is a Dan Morgan type of alpha leader of the defense. He's often called the heart of the Philly defense and would absolutely bring a swagger and be our field general on defense. We need this so badly and I'd almost rather go with him because Wallace is no guarantee to ever hit his potential, so maybe we go with Dean and find a Wallace replacement in on day 2. EDGE - Boye Mafe (SEA) I think he's a great blend of pass rush prowess, age and experience. We have our potential youngsters in Scourton and Umanmielen, let's add a vet from a successful franchise to bring some heat. Bye bye Wonnum....bye bye Jones. We roll with Mafe-Scourton-Umanmielen TE - Cade Otton (TB) Again, we have youth in this position w/ Sanders and Evans. Sanders is tracking similarly to Ian Thomas (age/stats) and wonder if he will ever be the TE we thought we stole in the 4th round. Evans looks legit, but more of a balanced/blocker. Sign Otton, who Dave is familiar with and save some money by cutting Tremble. Also allows us to roll Otton-Sanders-Evans in 13 personnel WR - Wan'dale Robinson or Rashid Shaheed I wonder if either of these will be priced out of our range based on age and what they bring. We do already have a 5'8" WR with Horn, Jr. so I'd see the argument against Robinson. However, the latter is still only 25 and just hit a 1k yard receiving season with suspect QB play in NY and an elite talent in Nabers on the roster. SEA gave up two '26 draft picks for Shaheed and he has stepped in nicely for the 'Hawks...doubt they let him walk. I also saw Doubs on the FA list and wonder if he'd be what we need. We need a separator that can be a deep threat to keep defenses honest. TMac/Coker are the bigger receivers, but not necesarily guys that scare a defense....would Doubs be that guy? SAF I'd like an upgrade here and wonder if we wait out the FA period until the latter stages if someone like Ar'Darious Washington or Jaylinn Hawkins lingers and there's a discount later in the game. Nick Scott can F off and I hope he never suits up for us again.   
    • I just can’t see Morgan as being under the threat of unemployment at any time this upcoming season.  As little as ‘winning’ the division and making the playoffs impressed me, I think to Tepper it was like nectar of the Gods. A milestone for him. And the team did play well in the Wild Card. That has to buy him 2027. I would think. Unless we start 0-8 or something. Which I don’t believe will happen. 
    • I'm not arguing that Linderbaum isn't a better player than Mays, just that the difference isn't as much as people might think. At least not compared to the difference in cost between the two players will be. In any event, I don't expect the Ravens to let him get to the open market.
×
×
  • Create New...