Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers have no interest in trading backs.


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

Since when do we take any of these comments for their word?? A week before Jake was cut they said there was going to be open competition in TC and Jake was going nowwhere.

Did he really? :sosp:

Did Marty Hurney actually say those things, or was it assumed?

Here's an article from back then...

Headline: Hurney says QB job is open for competition in 2010

Actual statements from Hurney...

“It’s the end of February and it’s way too early to answer that,” Hurney said during a press conference at Bank of America Stadium. “Everyone knows how we feel about Jake. And Matt came in and played very well at the end of the year. I think that we go through the process and see what happens.”

...

“I think we all know that we need consistent play at quarterback,” Hurney said. “I think we have taken time and gone through the process on things. Competition answers most of those questions. We certainly understand (fans' opinions). We know our job is to win football games and we’ll make our decisions with that in mind. But I think competition decides those things.”

...

“I’m not trying to be evasive, but I think part of our success in the draft has been that we try not to reach, we try not to go into the draft with a fixed mindset,” Hurney said. “We try to be flexible and get the best players available. All of those things will answer themselves over the next few months.”

Nowhere in there does he actually say "it'll be open competition". Nor did he say "we're keeping Delhomme." Those things were inferred by the writer.

Thus, Steve Reed said it. Marty Hurney didn't.

You have to know how to speak "Hurney and Fox". They don't outright lie. They just try to say nothing. But when they do make a clear statement, it's generally believable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think you have to factor in that we're still not an attractive proposition for Head Coaches. You're not getting the cream of the crop if you fire Canales a year after winning the NFC South, especially considering the situation he walked into.
    • Yeah, I was about to say I hope he's doing okay health-wise because he's not looking good in that pic.
    • Honestly, I dont  think he should be on the hot seat yet. A bad start to next year, then yes. Despite our mistakes on play calling this past season, we played better than anticipated overall. Bryce showed improvement and maturity (although still not nowhere close to our expectations). Better record and 2-15 to 5-12 to 8-9. Despite what we feel the stats dont lie we are improving by 3 wins a year. Could 11-6 be our expectation. That's a high bar but at the rate we are going, thats what its looking like. We all want to see a 5-12 to a 13-4 record but we are methodically moving up. Success doesnt happen overnight (well in most cases).  IMO we are struggling mostly on the defensive end. LB and edge are our biggest weakness. I see Bryce making improvements (even though I was a Bryce hater) next year. Biggest concern is LT on offense. How to fix this? We need a big name edge or to trade up and get a big name edge or LB and pick up one in FA and draft one. Also if in the 3rd we can pick up a TE. Dont know if Sanders is the answer or Tremble (even though I love Trembles blocking and power after the catch). If these two can get their footwork together they would be great. Maybe all they need is a better TE coach. And if Brooks can stay healthy and be the back we thought he could be, man that would be great
×
×
  • Create New...