Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Catalyst


PantherChris
 Share

Recommended Posts

Seeing guys come into the team mid season and mesh so well gave me hope and now we're seeing the dividends of that. We have some scoring power, we have a tight defensive zone and neutral zone game, an oppressive forecheck. We have the tools, it's just execution at this point. 

The problem in playing so aggressively for a full game is your mistakes can cost you and the bad bounces hurt more. It can deflate you. The fact that the 2nd period happened the way it happened and we kept our heads about it until those last few minutes of the third when we finally found the net again, it says a lot about this team's tenacity.

Too early to call us cup contenders, need to see us close this series in 4, but we are definitely on track. We look good as fug

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, lightsout said:

Seeing guys come into the team mid season and mesh so well gave me hope and now we're seeing the dividends of that. We have some scoring power, we have a tight defensive zone and neutral zone game, an oppressive forecheck. We have the tools, it's just execution at this point. 

The problem in playing so aggressively for a full game is your mistakes can cost you and the bad bounces hurt more. It can deflate you. The fact that the 2nd period happened the way it happened and we kept our heads about it until those last few minutes of the third when we finally found the net again, it says a lot about this team's tenacity.

Too early to call us cup contenders, need to see us close this series in 4, but we are definitely on track. We look good as fug

Pretty sure it's not betting favorite and all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

Pretty sure it's not betting favorite and all.

 

Yeah I've been a Canes fan long enough to not care about Vegas odds. If we can lose before the finals in some heartbreaking way, we tend to find that. Lol. I want us to take these first two series in 4 or 5 before I really believe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, lightsout said:

 

Yeah I've been a Canes fan long enough to not care about Vegas odds. If we can lose before the finals in some heartbreaking way, we tend to find that. Lol. I want us to take these first two series in 4 or 5 before I really believe. 

I've been a Canes fan since 99' never have we had this complete of a team doubt we down the rags in 4 or 5 but I think we do down them. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...