Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Food, Inc. Movie


bleys

Recommended Posts

Has anyone seen this?

Very eye opening, amazing the things we are not aware of, whether our ignorance comes from these large corporations doing everything they can to keep us in the dark or our arrogance to ignore this information..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

better has nothing to do with it. the taste should be the same.

the chances of E Coli are significantly reduced. To advert the support of the few large companies who have systems in place who's byproduct is the spread of E Coli would be the goal... and would be better, actually.

if both meat tastes the same but the support goes to a healthier future, why the resistance?

this not only affects the future of our health, but drives up oil prices (75 gallons a day per farm?) to feed the cows corn instead of the nature grasses their body needs to reduce E Coli in their system...

not sure why we would resist change, even to humor folks... resisting change is the American way I assume..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

better has nothing to do with it. the taste should be the same.

the chances of E Coli are significantly reduced. To advert the support of the few large companies who have systems in place who's byproduct is the spread of E Coli would be the goal... and would be better, actually. WRONG

if both meat tastes the same but the support goes to a healthier future, why the resistance? WRONG

this not only affects the future of our health, but drives up oil prices (75 gallons a day per farm?) to feed the cows corn instead of the nature grasses their body needs to reduce E Coli in their system... WRONG

not sure why we would resist change, even to humor folks... resisting change is the American way I assume..WRONG

Organic Farm Facts:

Tomatoes

* 122sq m of land is needed to produce a tonne of organic vine tomatoes. The figure for conventionally-grown loose tomatoes is 19sq m.

* Energy needed to grow organic tomatoes is 1.9 times that of conventional methods.

* Organic tomatoes grown in heated greenhouses in Britain generate one hundred times the amount of CO2 per kilogram produced by tomatoes in unheated greenhouses in southern Spain.

Milk

* Requires 80 per cent more land to produce per unit than conventional milk.

* Produces nearly 20 per cent more carbon dioxide and almost double the amount of other by-products that can lead to acidification of soil and pollution of water courses.

Chickens

* Organic birds require 25 per cent more energy to rear and grow than conventional methods.

* The amount of CO2 generated per bird is 6.7kg for organic compared to 4.6kg for conventional battery or barn hens.

* Eutrophication, the potential for nutrient-rich by-products to pollute water courses, is measured at 86 for organic compared to 49 for conventional.

* The depletion of natural resources is measured at 99 for organic birds compared to 29 for battery or barn hens.

Also, watch Penn & Teller Bullshit episode Organic Foods. You can find it streaming online easily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, this thread should die.. lol

20% of organic food comes from China..

organic pesticides are actually more harmful since they do not use synthetic pesticides, which have been engineered to be less harmful.

a cup or pot of coffee has a much greater chance of causing cancer than a years worth of synthetic pesticide residue...

all things I didn't know..

but putting these hippies on here is laughable.. they are only there for effect, no other real purpose..

saw the 1st 10 minutes, trying to find the rest..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, this thread should die.. lol

20% of organic food comes from China..

organic pesticides are actually more harmful since they do not use synthetic pesticides, which have been engineered to be less harmful.

a cup or pot of coffee has a much greater chance of causing cancer than a years worth of synthetic pesticide residue...

all things I didn't know..

but putting these hippies on here is laughable.. they are only there for effect, no other real purpose..

saw the 1st 10 minutes, trying to find the rest..

Really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Organic Farm Facts:

Tomatoes

* 122sq m of land is needed to produce a tonne of organic vine tomatoes. The figure for conventionally-grown loose tomatoes is 19sq m.

* Energy needed to grow organic tomatoes is 1.9 times that of conventional methods.

* Organic tomatoes grown in heated greenhouses in Britain generate one hundred times the amount of CO2 per kilogram produced by tomatoes in unheated greenhouses in southern Spain.

Milk

* Requires 80 per cent more land to produce per unit than conventional milk.

* Produces nearly 20 per cent more carbon dioxide and almost double the amount of other by-products that can lead to acidification of soil and pollution of water courses.

Chickens

* Organic birds require 25 per cent more energy to rear and grow than conventional methods.

* The amount of CO2 generated per bird is 6.7kg for organic compared to 4.6kg for conventional battery or barn hens.

* Eutrophication, the potential for nutrient-rich by-products to pollute water courses, is measured at 86 for organic compared to 49 for conventional.

* The depletion of natural resources is measured at 99 for organic birds compared to 29 for battery or barn hens.

Also, watch Penn & Teller Bullpoo episode Organic Foods. You can find it streaming online easily.

A government commissioned study in the UK. That didn't take into account water use, animal warefare & soil condition- bio diversity. Huge bullet points when it comes to organic farming.

There is more to organic farming then just cost benefit, No Sh*t your not going to be able to feed the world on organic farming the yields are just not there.

& I love Penn & Tellers Bullsh*t but for there organic food episode they used the Hudson Institute for there "Facts". The Hudson institute is pretty much funded by big agriculture & Chemical Mfgs: Cargill, ConAgra Foods, Exxon Mobil, McDonald's, Monsanto, National Agricultural Chemical Association.

& the whole thing with the hippy taste off, C'mon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grass Fed beef taste very different from grain fed. No doubt. In fact, some people find it strange.

How can anyone really dismiss the value of eating natural/organic foods??? Seriously.

Like PC said, no poo, the yields arent there...thats what started the whole thing. The part about the chickens is enough to make you think....

My wife has some family that own some chicken houses...they dont eat chicken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 99% of my complaints generally are front office complaints.  It may not appear that way always but that's where I have been for some time.   It's also why I constantly talk about random parts the last several years....  to this day, if they were going to draft Bryce Young....I thought they needed to do specific things.   They have literally done the opposite.   In a certain world, I would LOVE an AT.  A Bryce Young.  An XL.  All sorts of people.  How they have chosen to put it all together here? Meh.  I still think if Bryce Young is your QB....the easiest and obvious play for a team....would be a dynamic slot WR, a rec RB, and solid rec TE.  Spread it out.  Let him be the point guard.  I still think this team is being built for a different type QB....one that a Jake Delhomme style QB would thrive more in.  Which is in fact the heart of what Canales has been around and done.  So I nitpick it all.  If I had thought Bryce Young was going to rebound....I would have NEVER been all in on XL like I was.  I was all in XL because I thought the BY experiment was about to over quick.  Ladd would have made way more sense if you believed in BY IMO.   I don't think this team did.  I think Dave drafted XL because they were mentally ready to move on and did after 2 weeks.  and I thought the Frank think was bologna from the jump.  I just have hate the pairings and plan every since Rhule year 1.   Rhule year 1 was the last time I really thought this team was in a good place to give it a go.  It went horribly.  But....the zoomed out plan was pretty logical all around.  Rhule just was not ready and a clown on top of that.   I still think the Dave, BY, XL, Tmac build 3 round pegs and a square one at the end of the day.  Worst thing to happen to BY was to land in Carolina IMO.   Which is often how the NFL plays out.  Where you land and what the org does matters probably more than raw talent/ability often.  I do not actually have a problem with Adam Thielen in a vacuum.  He is overperforming in a vacuum all things considered.  
    • Bryce Young could throw for 40 tds and 4500 yards this season and my gut instinct still says you would triple down on hating him.
    • They should just be predetermined slotted contracts.  I feel like that was the intention of the current system, but they left too much room for interpretation about guaranteed money.  I agree though.  You play for who drafts you or you don't play.
×
×
  • Create New...