Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Serious question.......ladies input needed


Zcustom

Recommended Posts

lots of small-dicked guys patting each other on the back itt.

riiiigght, that wasn't the question though.

For example, I had one girl tell me that she can't handle anyone over 6.5-7, she had to break up with a guy who was too big.

My question rephrased, If being big is more often than not a disadvantage, why are so many guys obsessed with it/claim to be large?

Notice I was looking for ladies thoughts, I'm curious if that girl was in the majority or not.

Lord knows this does NOT need to turn into a pissing contest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

riiiigght, that wasn't the question though.

For example, I had one girl tell me that she can't handle anyone over 6.5-7, she had to break up with a guy who was too big.

My question rephrased, If being big is more often than not a disadvantage, why are so many guys obsessed with it/claim to be large?

Notice I was looking for ladies thoughts, I'm curious if that girl was in the majority or not.

Lord knows this does NOT need to turn into a pissing contest.

Nothing smoot says should be taken with more than 6.73 percent seriousness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your woman likes missionary and doggie style only, 6 inches is enough.

If she likes an arkansas saddle squat, she's going to need a little more.

This is the kind of technical data I was looking for, hadn't thought of that.

that's why jase is my homeboy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You must be one of these "one move away guys."
    • ESPN has a whole is just hot takes and the dumbest takes possible. That is why it sucks so badly. They intentionally drag everything down to a lightspeed retarded level so that it is unwatchable. No jounalism, no nuance, no in depth analysis....just idiot after idiot blabbering/shouting about some hot button issue that they really have no real strong opinions about until the camera is rolling.
    • Young is the overwhelming priority. We have ample time on them and it's far easier to pivot at WR than QB. Remember that 2026 is year 4 for Bryce. That is 5th year option decision time and also the prime time to attempt to regain resources if a pivot is made. The odds of gaining any assets in a trade afterwards plumment very rapidly(all this depending on performance, obviously). At the end of that cycle, now we are likely in a $45+ million territory for him to remain.  So that decision trumps all others by a mile when it comes to personnel. 
×
×
  • Create New...