Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Spread Offense


DirtyMagic97

Recommended Posts

Guest silver82blade

it does, very well. don't the patriots use it? i recall one game a few years ago where the packers used 4 or 5 receivers most of the game and passed at will over some team. i wish we would tailor our team to it. the more options an offense has, the less chance the defense will key into what they're doing and stop it. it takes a great qb and a deep receiving group, but as long as you have that then you're golden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The speed of the athletes. In college your 3rd n 4th WR is usually better than the 3rd n 4th CB. In the NFL LB's are just as fast as WR's

See I agree to some extent. Though, I've seen our LB's get beaten by receivers a few times. I just think if you get the ball in the hands of your speed players even just 3 yards down the field, it can turn in to a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest silver82blade

spread plays do not take a lot of time to develop. the qb is usually already in the shotgun, and he'll pass to an underneath receiver if he's open. also, nfl lbs are not as fast as wrs. maybe thomas davis can hang with some receivers, but not the typical lb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

spread plays do not take a lot of time to develop. the qb is usually already in the shotgun, and he'll pass to an underneath receiver if he's open. also, nfl lbs are not as fast as wrs. maybe thomas davis can hang with some receivers, but not the typical lb.

Yep. The key in pass-happy spreads is getting the ball away from the QB and into the hands of the playmakers. If we had a few quick guys, a spread system could work.

Wes Welker says your LB can't cover him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Kalkbrenner and Sion James received regular contracts and not two ways, so the Hornets have some work to do to cut the roster size down. 
    • Gustavsson would be insane. I think we would have to break the bank to afford that move. Which, I don't think is necessarily a bad idea. Ultimately, Freddie isn't likely to be around more than a couple of seasons more. We can all agree that unless they have a fleet of sports psychologists working on Kochetkov, he will never be capable of getting his head on straight enough to compete.
    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
×
×
  • Create New...