Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scarface on BET

Captroop

By Captroop,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
Posted

So I was watching Scarface the other night on BET, and it was single-handedly the most unpleasant experience of my life. Not the movie; the censorship!

It was terrible, half the time the screen was zoomed way it, like you could tell they were trying to crop the image of something unpleasant off the screen because the resolution went to shiz. When he was at his desk at the end, all you could see was his face because they zoomed in to crop the image of the mountain of coke. Oh, and the ignominy of watching him snort coke, with the sound of the snorting removed. What, are we supposed to think he rubbed his nose on a powder donut for some reason?

And the penultimate gunfight at the end was (I shiz you not) two minutes long. I remember looking at the clock and going, "It's 10:57 and this movie is supposed to end at 11? There's like 10 minutes left." The gun fight was basically in fast forward. "Say Hello to my little friend!" Bang! Bang! "I'm Still Standing!" Guy in sunglasses. BOOM! The end.

Wtf?

So my question is, if a movie is so objectionable that you have to cut our half of it to air it on your crappy network, why the hell are you airing it in the first place!? Scarface is about murder and drugs. If you cut out the murder and drugs, what's left? Why are you even showing the movie? Fug censorship in the ear, and all the whiny kids and hippie parents who make it "necessary."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
neverlosethefeeling Apprentice

neverlosethefeeling

Posted
Posted

I saw this too and was thinking the same thing. Scarface is such a classic movie that unless you can play it after like 2am on network television or get it on HBO/CineMax/Starz or Showtime you just shouldn't show it because of the amount of censorship it requires to make it agreeable to a regular TV audience. That movie is ruined by censorship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mmmbeans Newbie

mmmbeans

Posted
Posted

So I was watching Scarface the other night on BET, and it was single-handedly the most unpleasant experience of my life. Not the movie; the censorship!

It was terrible, half the time the screen was zoomed way it, like you could tell they were trying to crop the image of something unpleasant off the screen because the resolution went to shiz. When he was at his desk at the end, all you could see was his face because they zoomed in to crop the image of the mountain of coke. Oh, and the ignominy of watching him snort coke, with the sound of the snorting removed. What, are we supposed to think he rubbed his nose on a powder donut for some reason?

And the penultimate gunfight at the end was (I shiz you not) two minutes long. I remember looking at the clock and going, "It's 10:57 and this movie is supposed to end at 11? There's like 10 minutes left." The gun fight was basically in fast forward. "Say Hello to my little friend!" Bang! Bang! "I'm Still Standing!" Guy in sunglasses. BOOM! The end.

Wtf?

So my question is, if a movie is so objectionable that you have to cut our half of it to air it on your crappy network, why the hell are you airing it in the first place!? Scarface is about murder and drugs. If you cut out the murder and drugs, what's left? Why are you even showing the movie? Fug censorship in the ear, and all the whiny kids and hippie parents who make it "necessary."

why are they showing it? you watched it didn't you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The last half hour. Had I watched from the beginning, I would have tuned out much sooner.

*Edit*

And if you're really going down the "well they got your viewership, so they must know what they are doing," you should know that seeing what a movie on BET has greatly decreased my probablility of every watching a movie on that network again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mmmbeans Newbie

mmmbeans

Posted
Posted

The last half hour. Had I watched from the beginning, I would have tuned out much sooner.

*Edit*

And if you're really going down the "well they got your viewership, so they must know what they are doing," you should know that seeing what a movie on BET has greatly decreased my probablility of every watching a movie on that network again.

yea no doubt, i'm just saying. If you're upset by the general quality of television there's nobody to blame but the viewership, people don't demand quality so this is what people get. Hell, HBO doesn't even show letterbox films because people apparently don't care.

Alot of times with big movies like Scarface a larger network will pay to cut and pan/scan it and then as they move on will sell that recut to smaller networks. Then these smaller networks will then recut for run-time or whatever. These old cuts are done by crappy editors and the dub quality is really poor, add that to the general shittiness of pan/scan and you have a really crappy product that resembles more a rough arbitrary assembly than an actual film. But hey, it's scarface...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Jalen Ramsey

      By TD alt · Posted

      I mean, I get why the media and some NFL and Carolina fans are saying that we don't have a real chance, but as many Huddlers should know, we won't know what we really have in this team until probably late September or early October at the earliest. And I'm not trying to be a homer, I'm just looking at things historically. Obviously I'm also looking at Bryce's "palatable" improvement the last half of last season (including being the catalyst for hanging with and nearly beating the Super Bowl participants), and the new additions that we've acquired overall. I'm also looking at the beginnings of a culture change--even if perceptibly subtle--to some degree indeed may take a foothold if things start falling the right way. But, overall, I'm still cognizant of the realization that things could just go south and that perhaps that Bryce could revert and flop, or that D & D (Dan and Dave) are not the answer, but I still am not ready to say "we're far away." Hell we could be close, albeit with growing pains, but even if we're on the course to bring legit in 2026, then guys like Ramsey would be welcome additions this season. That's just my take on it. I don't think we'll know that we're far away until some point in the season. If we can compete in the South...who knows?
    • WUnderhill
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      You guys remember when the narrative on here was that Bryce would be chronically injured in the NFL due to his size and Anthony Richardson would be super durable due to his? You remember when the narrative was that Bryce was physically incapable of throwing a ball further than 20 yards in the NFL? You remember “I’ll stop complaining when he throws for more than 200 yards and looks like an NFL quarterback”? You remember when 60 sacks was his fault and not the offensive line, slow WRs, and terrible scheme? Pepperidge Farm remembers. It will always be something for some people. Whatever insanity they come up with will be quickly dropped to move on to the next thing. Bryce could have an MVP Super Bowl winning season and they would complain that we can’t run the tush push with him. It will always be something.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      For the Panthers fans still low on Bryce and demanding that he be a top-10 QB this upcoming season: What stat(s) will you need to see? Not the vibe you want, but rather what does he need to be top-10 in specifically? Passing yards? Completion percentage? Win-loss record? PFF grades? EPA? CPOE? Asking because this was asked before and... well... it ended up that the folks down on him didn't care about the numbers as much as they cared that they just couldn't get passed his size regardless of how he performed. It would be nice to get a straight-forward answer to that without the usual deflection and redirecting.
×
×
  • Create New...