Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Netscape


Darth Biscuit

Recommended Posts

Who the hell uses this browser anymore? I just went to a county GIS website to use their mapping application (using Chrome) and I got a "not supported" page and the three supported browsers it lists are IE, Firefox, and... Netscape???

WTF? I just looked up browsing stats and Netscape's not even listed anymore?

Interestingly, Firefox has the most as 46% for the past month in 2010, with three versions of IE coming in at around 32% (combined) and Chrome at 14%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You were on a county GIS website. Govt moves about 10 years slower than the rest of us, you should know that.

They probably just got firefox last week.

10 years? More like 20... hell, a lot of the counties in NC don't even have a GIS website and NC is VERY progressive in that area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

firefox is the bastard child of netscape from how I understand it.

If one is supported, they're both supported. (i think)

Originally yes but the code for Mozilla's product has evolved way past Netscape since 2008.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 years? More like 20... hell, a lot of the counties in NC don't even have a GIS website and NC is VERY progressive in that area.

Yes but they have a long way to go.

<< Hates Greensboro's GIS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but they have a long way to go.

<< Hates Greensboro's GIS

Char/Meck has a good site, New Hanover has a good site and there are a few others. I have a bud that is MIS director for Columbus and they have a great site for such a rural county. I have another bud who does GIS development work for some of the Piedmont counties and some of those are very nice.

Are you in GIS Jase or real estate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...