Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Netscape


Darth Biscuit

Recommended Posts

Who the hell uses this browser anymore? I just went to a county GIS website to use their mapping application (using Chrome) and I got a "not supported" page and the three supported browsers it lists are IE, Firefox, and... Netscape???

WTF? I just looked up browsing stats and Netscape's not even listed anymore?

Interestingly, Firefox has the most as 46% for the past month in 2010, with three versions of IE coming in at around 32% (combined) and Chrome at 14%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You were on a county GIS website. Govt moves about 10 years slower than the rest of us, you should know that.

They probably just got firefox last week.

10 years? More like 20... hell, a lot of the counties in NC don't even have a GIS website and NC is VERY progressive in that area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

firefox is the bastard child of netscape from how I understand it.

If one is supported, they're both supported. (i think)

Originally yes but the code for Mozilla's product has evolved way past Netscape since 2008.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 years? More like 20... hell, a lot of the counties in NC don't even have a GIS website and NC is VERY progressive in that area.

Yes but they have a long way to go.

<< Hates Greensboro's GIS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but they have a long way to go.

<< Hates Greensboro's GIS

Char/Meck has a good site, New Hanover has a good site and there are a few others. I have a bud that is MIS director for Columbus and they have a great site for such a rural county. I have another bud who does GIS development work for some of the Piedmont counties and some of those are very nice.

Are you in GIS Jase or real estate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...