Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

cadillac sixteen


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

Nice.Would love if they made this

At the confluence of GM paying off its initial federal loans (which doesn't count the $52 billion in U.S. Treasury funds in exchange for 60.8 percent of the company) and Bob Lutz's retirement as the automaker's chief car guy, the latest buzz is Cadillac has revived work on designing a flagship. The project has been on again/off again since Cadillac showed its V-16-powered Sixteen concept (pictured) at the 2003 Detroit show

Read more: http://www.motortrend.com/future/future_vehicles/1008_cadillac_flagship_is_back_on/index.html#ixzz0qyCizo2L

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that Lutz is gone they might make it, I think Lutz had put a complete ban on making interesting cars.

Funny thing is, Bob Lutz was responsible for some of the more interesting vehicles. The Ford Explorer and bringing over the Merker brand (for a long time the Merker was a great used car buy under $2,000) He was also responsible or the Viper and Prowler at Chrysler.

The Chrysler Atlantic was the car I wish had been built. A Straight-8 would have been a good throw back.

Several years ago a guy worked out a V-12 out of 2 GM V-6's. It would have given the Chrysler and Ford V-10s a run for its money!

I agree, I think they should make the Caddy!

BTW, BBC Amercica is my most watched channel on TV. Love Top Gear!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep, like I said, I don't mind guaranteeing them money, but make the contracts smaller amounts in order to minimize cap implications. I don't know about "half," the actual amounts, whether more or less than half, would have to be determined by the NFL and NFLPA (which will probably be highly contentious, if not "impossible").  I'm just for whatever leads to the best product on the field while also unaffecting my wallet. As an aside, the NFL owners are greedy bastards in my estimation. They're trying to keep a larger portion of the pie, but players' agents are greedy as well, and they've sewn seeds of greed among the players. It's not all their fault; we all know what our society has evolved into, but the NFL wants a bigger piece of our smaller pocketbooks and refuses to "negotiate" with us (that's why we don't have cheaper and more reasonable à la carte options to view games that they're gradually trying to migrate to paid TV), so fu<k 'em. And then on top of that we have guys trying to water down the product even more by feeding greed. Change the way things are done so that we can at least see players prove themselves on the field without throwing wrenches into the engine that pays guys that have proven they can play on a pro level.
    • So if one of the parents wants to buy the theatre group or the band lunch they should get banned?
×
×
  • Create New...