Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which trade do you prefer?


panthersphan

Recommended Posts

Toronto we'd have a starting PG at least!

And we'd have lost one of best trade chips as essentially a throw-in. There's still a chance the Calderon deal could get done, just without Chandler included. Chandler was orignially included so we could get some of the trade exception, and Toronto has way too many guards on their payroll. It wouldn't surprise me if this trade was revisted, and Diaw and Mohammad get sent to Toronto for Calderon.

I don't think we can look at the Dallas deal as a singularity. When you move Tyson Chandler for Eric Dampier, you're getting a better trade chip to work with. Jordan has something up his sleeve that's going to require Dampier getting traded, I fully believe that. There's nothing about the Dallas trade that says "ok, we're done!" and considering that our FO has been pretty solid when it comes to trades, I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt that they've got something else coming.

But if they don't, they can go fug themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sure, there's definitely a chance that a fire sale in 2022 could've paid off but I don't think that's a certainty. It's not just about stockpiling the picks and bettering odds; it's about hitting on those picks, having a stable coaching staff to develop them, and keeping the locker room engaged. We didn't exactly have a model front office nor stable coaching staff in 2022. It's worth noting that part of the reason that DJ had to be included in the trade up for #1 was because the Bears needed an immediate, proven WR1 to help Fields. It was him or another immediate first-round pick, not a future one like what was being offered for Burns (whom teams knew that things were shaky with and that they could afford to wait). As for the Eagles, they recovered because the foundation was already in place. Pederson got flak and was ultimately fired (and was just fired again this offseason from the Jags). Their recovery was quick because the foundation was already in place: Howie Roseman and a solid roster (that included a stacked OL, a second year QB, and a veteran defense). Philly had a margin of error that just wasn't available to Carolina. I'm not against using the draft to rebuild, but a full-on teardown comes with real consequences: fan disengagement, a fractured locker room, poor development, a losing environment... and I don't believe that we had the necessary leadership at the time to cleanly navigate it. That's a gamble that I want no part of.  Now that we do have a staff that seems to be in complete alignment and building for the future rather than fighting for their jobs, I'm more inclined to observe their process and see where it leads rather than backseat driving with "perfect" hindsight. 
    • I see it a bit differently considering there is only 20M in cap space. Given how many of the premium positions are on rookie contracts their cap should not be nearly maxed out. Tillis still has a lot of work to do before these rookies will need a second contract. 
×
×
  • Create New...