Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My girlfriend wants to experiment with girls. (Please Help)


P-paw

Recommended Posts

lol I can't pie or rep you, Zcustom, but I will get you back later...

My opinion, regardless of how old you are, is that this is a sign of emotional instability on her part, and a sign of things to come (no pun intended)...

To her defense, maybe she doesn't know what she wants right now, and if that is the case, you should let her go... If she doesn't come back, it wouldn't have worked out anyways...

Sounds to me like you are looking for love, and she's looking for something else... You'll only end up hurting yourself if you stand by and allow it to happen without looking out for yourself in the process...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, my girlfriend told me today that she'd like to try "things" with other girls. We are both relatively young, but I'm still not sure what to think of the matter..so i was looking for a few second opinion's about this. She said there would be no emotions attached, but I still feel in some way that I would be getting cheated on. I'm not sure if its because in a way I'm jealous or what. But, to be honest...I don't know what to think...and I was just looking to see what some others thought. Here is some random information..

She said that if I was not able to be understanding and what not..she'd want to break up with me...and find a guy that IS. I don't understand un-emotional sex. Well, any help ladies and gentleman? (serious answers please)

You are now free to cheat on your girl without feeling any guilt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

generally I'd say helz ya, let her do it and try to get in on it as much as you possibly can. When I re-read it though and see that she is telling you let her try or she's kicking you to the curb, this tells me she's not so crazy about you as maybe you hope or think she is. Anyone that gives their mate an ultimatum like that is probably looking for a reason to get out of the relationship in my opinion. Play along and see if you can score the threeway, but plan on being single soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it that guys that would have a problem with this are always the ones hooking up with women like that?

I would never have a problem with it and I can never meet a girl into that.

Sometimes I hate God's sense of humor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...