Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Computer Questions, do they ever end?


d-dave

Recommended Posts

So I used to be really computer literate. I could be a sweet at windows 98 machine from the ground up...in 1999. As I've worked and gotten married, I've lost the time to catch up and now I am totally confused, and trying to help my wife decide on her next laptop is incredibly difficult. There are two parts to the equation: WTF is going on with the new technology? and Macbook versus similarly spec'd Toshiba/Dell?

First off: Have intel and AMD lost their minds making these new processors so difficult to describe to a laymen? I've looked up the specs for the new batch of AMDs and intels and I come away scratching my head and wondering how you're supposed to know which laptop to buy? Intel or AMD? This leads to the next part...

This is where the real "I have no idea what its doing" part of things. My wife is a teacher and she does a lot of multimedia work. From creating and editing audio/video tracks, to burning DVDs, to photo collages, etc. She's trying to go high tech for her students and as part of a project she's working on. So that makes me say "Get a Mac." I say that because their programs for audio and video rock and are supper easy. My problem comes up when I look at the price. The $1200 for the 13.3" with a core 2 duo processor (old tech I'm pretty sure) is kind of a tough pill to swallow when you can get a better, bigger PC for much less. My wife has had her toshiba for seven years (which I'm using because it won't attach files in her gmail), and it's really showing its age.

So Oh Huddle-Nerds-of-l337-knowledge, help an aging, confused, slightly drunk husband help his wife make the right decision. Her friends are saying macbook, and I can't disagree too much for her needs. Though I'd love for her to get a PC so maybe with the extra dough, I can get a new computer as my HP is a piece of garbage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Macs but really they aren't worth the premium.

tomshardware.com is a great site to ask questions. But what you really want to look at there is their Deal sections

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/vizio-logicbuy-deals-core-i7-blu-ray,10993.html

heres the most recent one they have a 1,000 dollar laptop that will blow that Mac out of the water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...