Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you consider this trade?...


tarheelpride

Peppers for a pick and Ashomagi - would you do it?  

51 members have voted

  1. 1. Peppers for a pick and Ashomagi - would you do it?



Recommended Posts

Oakland offers us Ashomagi and a pick for Julius Peppers (who we franchise), would you bite?

Case for trade: shores up bad secondary and gives us flexibility to release Lucas. frees up cap room for Ashomagi to get extension, as well as sign Gross to deal. Extra pick for a possible trade up (provided it's high enough). Teams won't throw easily on us.

Case Against trade: what will happen to the pass rush? who will take over for Pep? impossible nearly to compensate for his skills. great secondary + no pass rush = all day to throw. Who said Ashomagi can fit in the system? and will the system change?

I would do it but thats not going to happen. I think the Raiders would be foolish to do that. I wish we could get both of these guys on the Texans. We have 30 to 40 million under the cap so we might be able to sign Ashomagi, peppers and dunta robinson. That combo would put us in the AFC championship for sure. I just doubt the Texans will pay them all of the cap money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the problem in my mind is yes Asomugha is a great corner who would fit in our scheme, but we need to change our scheme. We need our corners to play physical, if we got Asomugha Turgocrap would have him do the same things we ask of Lucas. Play off the WR 10-15yds and keep everything in front of you, we don't care if he picks up 20yds just keep him in front.

Now in my mind Asomugha would do a much better job at this by jumping the routes, but we need to change our whole secondary mentality by becoming a physical unit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd take that trade in a skinny minute for their 1st rounder but Peppers will never agree to it. He wants to play for a team that has a good chance to win the SB. Thats what he said. I don't think he believes the Panthers have a chance to win the SB any time soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd take that trade in a skinny minute for their 1st rounder but Peppers will never agree to it. He wants to play for a team that has a good chance to win the SB. Thats what he said. I don't think he believes the Panthers have a chance to win the SB any time soon.

If peppers wants to play for a superbowl contender he needs to stay put of come to houston. We are a pass rusher away from being a serious contender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If peppers wants to play for a superbowl contender he needs to stay put of come to houston. We are a pass rusher away from being a serious contender.

cost too much for the texans. pay mario williams AND julius pep? it will break ya'll. although it'll solve many of your defensive problems

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cost too much for the texans. pay mario williams AND julius pep? it will break ya'll. although it'll solve many of your defensive problems

No Mario is paid and we will have between 30 and 40 million under the cap. We are 29, 700,000 under right now. I would really rather go after namdi from the raiders and get another DE in the draft though. Peppers needs a change of pace...time to leave home big boy...come on and get some texas BBQ...:D....I just hope we get Dunta Robinson signed before we look at any other teams free agents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...