Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Avengers Villain?

o803oVaDeR

By o803oVaDeR,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

o803oVaDeR Newbie

o803oVaDeR

Posted
Posted

So who do you think will be the main Villain in the Avengers movie?

Rumors so far have been Hulk, Loki, Thanos, Skrulls, Ultron, Dr. Doom, and The Mandarin.

I think Hulk would suck, maybe spend a little time on them chasing and fighting him to convince him to join, but other than that no thanks.

Loki is already the main baddie in Thor, and he is signed to be in the movie, but I think if Thor handles him on his own it would be a hard sell that he would be a threat all by his self against the whole Avengers team.

Thanos would be my #1 or #2 choice. I think he is the baddest of baddies, and with the Infinity Gauntlet being confirmed in Thor, I think it would make for a great story.

I think the Skrulls could be cool, but I have never been a huge fan of shape shifting aliens. From what I hear this is the most likely candidate.

Ultron, I dont know much about, but he sounds ok. He just needs a good deal of back story, so I think he would be better for a sequel.

Dr. Doom Would be my other #1 or #2 choice. I think he is one of the greatest villains. He was misused so bad in the Fantastic 4 movies. I think Fox owns the rights to him though, so not likely. Marvel is trying to buy the Fantastic 4 back though, so there is still hope for Dr. Doom to at least be in a future sequel.

The Mandarin is rumored to be in the next Iron Man movie, but isn't the next Iron Man movie the Avengers. It could be him, but I think he needs a big back story as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mike2.0
      Cam on ‘The Bank’

      By Mike2.0 · Posted

      Incorrect, I have watched us consistently over quite a number of years. When I say Cam relied on athleticism, I simply mean his dual threat style and athleticism overshadowed the deficiencies in the passing game (his own or those created by the system).  Now I wouldn’t disagree that our OCs over that time were not amazing and arguably held him back, but correct me if I’m wrong, Cam had a habit of locking onto his receivers and overthrowing them. Gettleman even drafted two big receivers - Kelvin Benjamin and Devin Funchess - to give Cam receivers with a big catch radius.  Again, correct me if I’m wrong, but Cam had some mechanical issues. For example, the reliance on arm strength over touch and his footwork often led to him throwing off the back foot. There were many debates on these boards about his mechanics, with far more knowledgeable posters than I braking down what he needed to improve on. End of the day, I was as big a Cam fan as the next person, but he did have his shortcomings as a passer. Had he played under someone like Sean McVay or a similar offensive guru, with a high quality QB coach, then I’m sure they would have ironed out the kinks and he would have been far more dangerous and successful than he was. And that’s a scary thought of what he could have been under the likes of a McVay! 
    • mav1234
      shough vs tmac off rookie of the year

      By mav1234 · Posted

      It's true that we are not scoring at a much higher clip than the Saints. They're averaging ~18.4 with Shough and in that same span we're averaging ~19, so pretty close, despite Bryce having better TD numbers over that period. Both our teams are a far, far cry from the NFL average of 23.3...
    • Basbear
      NFC South is now ACTIVATED

      By Basbear · Posted

      I like when this big kat is going crazy panther fan and not the pat jersey betting against persona. 
×
×
  • Create New...