Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ok I've Been Negative But I See The Positive Light Now


beastson

Recommended Posts

Idk, but watching Steve interview on our site being so calm and collected made me think a little bit and not be so irate and upset as before. The D Im not worried about, this is mainly for the Offense.

Getting hammered like that I think will make them work even harder, and I got a feeling they will get better. Even the coaches will improve so they wont repeat that performance. You fall and rise together

Only negative really is Matt injury. Now he wont get a chance to correct those mistakes he made cause he wont be able to play. Now we gotta insert a rookie and we'll have to run successfully in order to perform well. On that flip side, our o-line will have to play hard and open some holes against a Tampa D that we can rip with the run

Hey I still got the same feelings on Fox, and its still put Goodson as 3rd string

Link to comment
Share on other sites

good post...i still have faith in moore. its not like the giants are the bucs or lions. but what im worried about, is jimmy getting the start cause of moores injury, and he will excel against a weak team at home against tampa bay, when moore could do just as well. then when jimmy plays a good team, like New orleans or so, he will not do to well. i just dont have faith in jimmy, and moore just had a bad game. last year in 5 games he played great. he cant always play great...and yesterday was just his bad game...jake had them, even when he was good..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yesterdays game reminded me of the bucs game of '08. Yesterday provided so many opportunities to take control of the game and we could not get the ball in the endzone or capitalize on turnovers. I have to chalk this one up as a bad game but there are some bright spots to take into next week. The sky will only be falling if we lose to the bucs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you rewatch that game it is really crazy how the Giants really did not want to win that game.

So many things happened that should/could have turned the game back into our favor in such a short amount of time in the 4th quarter.

3 INTs in the end zone will not happen in every game, and even with those we had 18 points.

We could easily put up 24 per game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After the mandatory 24 hour cool down, I'm left with one question.

If had lost 31-30, would we be angry? Or, what about 7-6? Because last I checked all that goes down is "Loss". In two weeks I think we can start making snap judgments.

I'm always mad after we lose, but 31-30 would show that our offense was a bit more competent.

Which would give me more to look forward to as we progress through the season.(need a pass rush though)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way we played, regardless of the outcome, made me very angry. Actually more sad than angry...

The only thing that made me really angry was the (second to last) drive where we moved the ball down the field nicely, and then once inside the 10 we didn't call a single running play. I get that we had a sense of urgency, but isn't that why we have our backs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After the mandatory 24 hour cool down, I'm left with one question.

If had lost 31-30, would we be angry? Or, what about 7-6? Because last I checked all that goes down is "Loss". In two weeks I think we can start making snap judgments.

mandatory cool down sounds like a good idea for everyone. we'd see a lot less threads about clausen and smoothies right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...