Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What are you more upset about?

panthers1789

By panthers1789,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Skew Newbie

Skew

Posted
Posted

My level of upset goes like this, with the most upset at the top:

fans that want to get rid of Jake for this bad game.

(his good game/bad game ratio is better than most starting qbs)

Turg hasn't been fired yet.

Defense hasn't played worth a poo in months (see above)

secondary leaving Fitz open

Jakes turnovers

Fox's game planning

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted

All of you who are bitching about the zone coverage. It was zone coverage the Cards were using to limit Steve Smith to ZERO catches (with the help of Jake being lame) for almost a full 3 quarters. The difference is execution. Learn it, or stop complaining about something you don't understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RockECU Newbie

RockECU

Posted
Posted

All of you who are bitching about the zone coverage. It was zone coverage the Cards were using to limit Steve Smith to ZERO catches (with the help of Jake being lame) for almost a full 3 quarters. The difference is execution. Learn it, or stop complaining about something you don't understand.

Ummmm.. yea.. OUR execution of OUR zone was pretty much the problem.. What don't you understand about that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OneBadassCat Newbie

OneBadassCat

Posted
Posted

Im upset because the panthers are a better team than that and they should have stomped on the cards. 2 weeks to prepare and the coaching staff comes up with a bullshit game plan. They also abandoned the run when they could have kept going. They panicked 14-7 and tried to make Jake pass to victory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers1789 Newbie

panthers1789

Posted
  • Author
Posted

All of you who are bitching about the zone coverage. It was zone coverage the Cards were using to limit Steve Smith to ZERO catches (with the help of Jake being lame) for almost a full 3 quarters. The difference is execution. Learn it, or stop complaining about something you don't understand.

Different coverages work for different teams.

Our coaches saw it wasnt working and they still didn't adjust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      That's it. How do you feel about this draft class.

      By strato · Posted

      I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...