Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A question about legs

Hairless Cat

By Hairless Cat,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

H2oproof Newbie

H2oproof

Posted
Posted

Did you condition with the WR's? Did you run the same amount of sprints and routes as they did day in and day out? The answer is No.

A spread offense QB will be in a better running condition than a pocket passer every time. But no matter how much he runs, he will never run as much as a WR, so don't even pretend to argue that he would.

actually the answer is yes (except for routes for obvious reasons)

LMAO @ you trying to tell me what went on during my training and practices at college

why do some of you guys continue to run your mouths when you dont know what in the world you're talking about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Floppin Grand Master

Floppin

Posted
Posted

actually the answer is yes (except for routes for obvious reasons)

LMAO @ you trying to tell me what went on during my training and practices at college

why do some of you guys continue to run your mouths when you dont know what in the world you're talking about?

You act like your the only one that played football that posts on a football forum there guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
charlotte49er Newbie

charlotte49er

Posted
Posted

Please correct me if I'm worong. But didn't hr drop the ball 2-3 times in one pre-season game as a PR/KR?

Seems to me, that his legs aren't the problem.

Every Coach and GM have a "Project PLayer". I thought that Edwards was the Panthers "PP". Maybe not come in and make an impact this year, but somewhere in the next 2 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
H2oproof Newbie

H2oproof

Posted
Posted

You act like your the only one that played football that posts on a football forum there guy.

lol no i dont

i dont even know how you came to that assumption

i just pointed out that conditioning isnt really a problem when a spread QB is switched to WR

see josh cribbs, julian edleman, antwan randle el, rasheed marshall, etc.

just stop

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Floppin Grand Master

Floppin

Posted
Posted

lol no i dont

i dont even know how you came to that assumption

i just pointed out that conditioning isnt really a problem when a spread QB is switched to WR

see josh cribbs, julian edleman, antwan randle el, rasheed marshall, etc.

just stop

Josh Cribbs was a return man for 5 years basically. He had one catch as a rookie at WR. So WR conditioning doesn't apply.

Edelman Started 7 games and had 359 yards. I'd be willing to bet that conditioning had something to do with that.

Antwan Randle El didn't start a single game as a rookie but he did make some situational catches. So I'll give you that one.

The fact is that it's a tough transition and conditioning is part of it. I'm sorry that you want to believe that you were in as good of shape as your WR's in college, but the fact is that you weren't. While you were doing QB drills they were doing WR drills. WR's always run in practice no matter what they are doing. QB's do not. To equate the two is ridiculous and makes you look stupid. It's like saying a Defensive end runs as much as a Cornerback because they are always rushing the QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
H2oproof Newbie

H2oproof

Posted
Posted

Josh Cribbs was a return man for 5 years basically. He had one catch as a rookie at WR. So WR conditioning doesn't apply.

Edelman Started 7 games and had 359 yards. I'd be willing to bet that conditioning had something to do with that.

Antwan Randle El didn't start a single game as a rookie but he did make some situational catches. So I'll give you that one.

The fact is that it's a tough transition and conditioning is part of it. I'm sorry that you want to believe that you were in as good of shape as your WR's in college, but the fact is that you weren't. While you were doing QB drills they were doing WR drills. WR's always run in practice no matter what they are doing. QB's do not. To equate the two is ridiculous and makes you look stupid. It's like saying a Defensive end runs as much as a Cornerback because they are always rushing the QB.

you continue to speak about something you know nothing about

but whatever brah.

i made my point and you seem to be the only one who is trying to go back and forth

you "win" this argument

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Floppin Grand Master

Floppin

Posted
Posted

Know how you're still just a small time football program? When you spend time defending any and all of your players in the NFL.

Pretty sure the only one talked about on this board at any length is Armanti Edwards and he's not the only player currently playing in the NFL from ASU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DaveThePanther2008
      Panthers OLB Pat Jones II makes bold claim about team's defense

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Canes vs Panthers Rd 3 Gm3 8pm

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • Icege
      PFF ranks the 2025 starting QBs

      By Icege · Posted

      I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...