Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone have a front loader washing machine?


charlotte49er

Recommended Posts

Front-load ones typically more energy efficient because they use less water and a bit gentler on clothing than the old models we grew up with. Also the top allows for storage top. But there are top feeds that are energy efficient too nowadays.

Just depends on location and what's important to you regarding features.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fiance and I just got new appliances last weekend.

The water thing for front loaders is correct. They suggest that you leave the door cracked when not using it so that air can get in and allow it to evaporate. If it's closed all the time, that's obviously an air/water tight seal, so the remaining water has no way of getting out. If it doesn't get out, it can cause mildew and for the washer and your clothes to start smelling. Every place we went to suggested using afresh (I think that's what it was called) once a month to help fight bacteria/mildew/smells.

There's basically no difference in front loaders and top loaders anymore. We got a top loader that uses the same technology as front loaders and saved nearly $300. A top loader without an agitator (column running down the middle of the washer) is using the same technology as a front loader and is as energy efficient as well. The clothes are 'agitated' by the bin moving within the washer while it spins at the same time. It's also better for your clothes as they're not treated as harshly in the washer as they would with an old school agitator where they get beat and wrapped around the column in the middle.

Stay away from LG's, Frigidaire's and (I think the third brand was) GE. Was told that by several different places. As for places to get them, HHGregg is a bit annoying because they're almost like a car dealership... but at the same time, will do just about everything they can to get you the best deal (store manager said he'd sell us the appliances for a dollar over cost, if necessary). But, if you can get them to write you out a quote (tell them it's for a contractor), you can then take that quote to Lowe's and they'll match it. That's what we did because the fiance was more comfortable with dealing with Lowe's.

Unfortunately, I have more knowledge on washers/dryers/dishwashers than I care to have at the moment... at least I purged the stuff about how to run it, so I can't be expected to do the laundry. That's the fiance's job. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was actually a Samsung set at HHGregg that was only about $150 a piece more than the top loaders we got, the only problem with the frontloaders for us is that they're so low to the ground unless you get the stands, and the stands are an extra $200 a piece as well. Complete rip off imo.

As far as the top loaders causing issues with the clothes... we've obviously not had ours long enough to see any ill effects, but it is literally the EXACT same technology, just not stood on its side. Can't imagine that would make a whole lot of difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was actually a Samsung set at HHGregg that was only about $150 a piece more than the top loaders we got, the only problem with the frontloaders for us is that they're so low to the ground unless you get the stands, and the stands are an extra $200 a piece as well. Complete rip off imo.

As far as the top loaders causing issues with the clothes... we've obviously not had ours long enough to see any ill effects, but it is literally the EXACT same technology, just not stood on its side. Can't imagine that would make a whole lot of difference.

Well, I'm short so not having the pedestal doesn't bother me, plus it makes it easier for my 9 year old to help with the laundry. Not to mention I want to have a folding table installed on top of them. So it would work fine for me.

I thought about the same thing since it's the same technology, it was just weird reading all those reviews about it.

What is this HHGregg store all about? We don't have one locally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just another electronics store, but they mainly specialize in appliances. They don't get as much business as a Lowe's or Best Buy, so they usually have damn good prices. But, like I said, they're also ruthless sales people, which can be good and bad. We just lucked out with an awesome sales guy at Lowe's and he hooked us up by matching all of HHGregg's prices and giving us a better warranty.

And yes, for a 9 year old, front loaders would probably be perfect. But, my fiance is 5'2", and she was even pretty worried about how low the front loaders were. I'm 6'2" and those doors are pretty much at my knees. If you're comfortable with it though, and you seem to already have a plan, do what's best for you. I'm in no way trying to sway you one way or the other. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was actually a Samsung set at HHGregg that was only about $150 a piece more than the top loaders we got, the only problem with the frontloaders for us is that they're so low to the ground unless you get the stands, and the stands are an extra $200 a piece as well. Complete rip off imo.

As far as the top loaders causing issues with the clothes... we've obviously not had ours long enough to see any ill effects, but it is literally the EXACT same technology, just not stood on its side. Can't imagine that would make a whole lot of difference.

I want low to the ground, (Wheelchair.) so that's not a problem for me. Top loaders can be a problem for me to reach in and get all the clothes out. When I move into my new place the first thing I'm buying is a Washer & Dryer. Then I"m thinking a Futon for the living room!

One problem I don't have is a basement. So water doesn't have to get pumped up to drain, which is what the lady said at the laundromat. Good to know about leaving the door cracked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So how about the Mondays after we lose? Because those Mondays after the Jags, Pats, and Bills games better have been run suicides until your legs fall off...
    • Saints trade WR Shaheed to Seahawks Seahawks get: WR Rashid Shaheed Saints get: 2026 fourth-round pick, 2026 fifth-round pick Seahawks' grade: A- Saints' grade: B+ One of the NFL's hottest passing teams just got better. The Seahawks currently rank third in EPA per dropback (0.25) and first in success rate on dropbacks (53%). And now they are adding Shaheed in a move that makes sense both on the field and in terms of where the Seahawks are as a franchise. Shaheed, 27, is averaging 1.8 yards per route run this season. But I think that sells him short because that number is down a bit from his career average entering this year (2.0) and he's been playing a role that includes running fewer vertical routes (34%) compared to last year (44%). Shaheed also has consistently posted above-average open scores in ESPN's receiver score metrics, including a 63 this season that ranks 28th among wide receivers. As a complement to Jaxon Smith-Njigba, I expect Shaheed will run downfield more often and be a bigger threat in that role than rookie Tory Horton was. When Cooper Kupp returns, he and Shaheed will make for a nice pair of secondary threats behind one of the best receivers in the league in Smith-Njigba. This is the time to strike for the Seahawks. FPI gives Seattle an 84% chance to make the playoffs and a 5% shot at winning the Super Bowl. This addition helps boost their chances without mortgaging their future the way the Colts did in the Sauce Gardner trade. Shaheed is a pending free agent but given the leverage of the moment for the Seahawks and their need I think they ought to be plenty willing to pay the cost. Shaheed is young enough to where if Seattle doesn't retain him he should sign a free agent contract that would yield Seattle a compensatory pick -- if the Seahawks don't nullify that pick with signings of their own. Because the Seahawks currently have $79 million in cap space next year, per OverTheCap, getting that compensatory pick is not guaranteed. The Saints are not rolling in cap space the way the Seahawks are -- and thus would land a compensatory pick for Shaheed -- but they got more draft capital this way than they otherwise would have. Considering New Orleans' 1-8 record, this should have been an easy decision.
×
×
  • Create New...