Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Skyline


Matt Foley

Recommended Posts

i love the lotus but those two cars aren't even in the same league.

True, but considering the price and the manufacturer, I would take the Lotus even though you can get a few tenths of a second on the 0-60 with the Nissan. The real advantage is obviously the top speed, but that means little unless you routinely take your vehicle to the track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but considering the price and the manufacturer, I would take the Lotus even though you can get a few tenths of a second on the 0-60 with the Nissan. The real advantage is obviously the top speed, but that means little unless you routinely take your vehicle to the track.

i love them both. for the money, the lotus is about as cool a car as they make.

it's pretty much just a go-kart. but the gtr is a legit supercar.

if i was gonna buy one i'd get the lotus, if i was being given one i'd take the gtr.

this is what i really want. and i generally hate mercedes.

weblux580-04-2010-sls-amg-leakage.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i love them both. for the money, the lotus is about as cool a car as they make.

it's pretty much just a go-kart. but the gtr is a legit supercar.

if i was gonna buy one i'd get the lotus, if i was being given one i'd take the gtr.

this is what i really want. and i generally hate mercedes.

It might be a go-kart, but it really does go. Honestly, if they could fit a V6 in there it would be a very dangerous go-kart.

The GT-R is nice but they could do better. Hell, the 458 is about 400kg lighter than the GT-R.

I don't know too much about Mercedes (or cars in general) but I have to say I like the looks of some of the Mercedes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...