Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I H8 WoW

blackcatgrowl

By blackcatgrowl,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

blackcatgrowl Newbie

blackcatgrowl

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yeah, they do actually.

But I shed my addiction after marriage counseling in 2004. My wife had a point that 40+ hours of WoW a week was a bit much. Still, I got to see the original Onyxia drop in a 40-man :)

From then to 2007, I would play on average 20 hours a week.

I really don't know how this is going to work with a 3 year old and a 10 month old though... lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Saltman Apprentice

The Saltman

Posted
Posted

Yeah, they do actually.

But I shed my addiction after marriage counseling in 2004. My wife had a point that 40 hours of WoW a week was a bit much.

From then to 2007, I would play on average 20 hours a week.

I really don't know how this is going to work with a 3 year old and a 10 month old though... lol

u might as well just burn the game bro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
blackcatgrowl Newbie

blackcatgrowl

Posted
  • Author
Posted

u might as well just burn the game bro.

Well, the idea is that me and some friends, who are all married and/or have kids are going to have a set night to play once a week, plus whatever we can manage during the weekends.

But my 'lock is damn tempting to get to 80 before the x-pac comes out. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
natty Newbie

natty

Posted
Posted

I go through cycles with wow. I played a lot at release and quit a while before the first expansion. Then I played a good bit through burning crusade and quit a while before lich king came out. Then a played a good bit right when ulduar was released, and then quit. I came back briefly to see icecrown citadel but didn't stick with it. If I wasn't in a raiding guild that didn't mind me quiting for long chunks of time I probably would have never started up again all those times.

I was going to check out everything with the new patch but it seems like fallout will keep me occupied until the expansion comes out. I'm sure I won't be able to resist my curiosity and buy the expansion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NAS
      Packers game predictions

      By NAS · Posted

      I like our chance to at least look respectable with Bryce, but we will still be overmatched. They have better X’s and O’s and the Jimmies and Joes.
    • kungfoodude
      Not Necessarily Panthers Related but....

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      Well the entire intent of this is based on success of the pick based on the performance of the QB for an "expected" minimum return. I think that is where maybe I am not explaining what I am doing as well as I need to. The intent of all of this is to spit out a percentage of "success" for QB's picked in each round. The specific QB's are just lines of data in the spreadsheet that's feeding the minimums. So what I am attempting to do is build out/fine tune a reasonable set of minimums you would expect to see given the round drafted(cost, if you will). My logic is basically this: 1st Rounders Hall of Fame - No explanation needed. This was an all time great player. MVP/All Pro/Pro Bowl - Achievement that even if only happened once, this was a worthy investment. The player was able to reach near or league best play, even if briefly.  IMO, using just one as a threshold is fair. Even though it might only happen once, they reached their potential. This also filters out some other elements like injury shortened careers. Guys like Andrew Luck and RGIII pass as "successful" without being filtered out by the next minimum. 8+ Years as a Starter: This is a bit more debateable but I have included it as a function to catch some guys that might be a "soft success." The logic here being that perhaps a lengthy NFL starting career is "good enough" to be a success. Much more so than a failure. A drafted QB that was able to be a long term NFL starter is very desired, even if elite status was not ever truly reached. The only example of this that DOESN'T include some previously listed accolades in the almost 300 data points is.....Joe Flacco. And I think anyone at this point would have a hard time arguing that he was not a successful 1st round pick.   I am just gonna explain the first round logic but the rest of the rounds are similar. If you achieve any of these things, I would consider you a "success." Perhaps that will make it my thought process more clear.   Once again, very grateful to have all the debates and input on this. I do want to make this a meaningful thing I can keep updating.
    • SaltAndPepper
      Packers game predictions

      By SaltAndPepper · Posted

      we win...  i have nothing to lose and everything to gain with this prediction
×
×
  • Create New...