Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Creepy Gynecologists


LifeisaGarden

Recommended Posts

Ive been in the room with my wife with two OBGYNs. (while she was prego). One did a pelvic exam. Had my face in the corner, fingers in ears going LA LA LA LA LA.

But really, i just wanted to ask both of them, "Why you wanna look at bad poon all day mang?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you really think about it, I bet very few women have a pretty cooter & those fuggers actually chose that profession. YUCK!

LOL, it's a ying yang world. For every hot, shaved 19 year old College freshmen you get a nasty 73 year old with a yeast infection I imagine.

I guess if you pulled in 250k every year it might be worth it but do you think Dr. OBGYN goes home and goes down on the little woman? :smilielol5:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you really think about it, I bet very few women have a pretty cooter & those fuggers actually chose that profession. YUCK!

I think it's the other way around, to guys anyway. We met very few we didn't like!

Unless your first reaction is this,

bgd341.jpg

!BjBjF+wBGk~$(KGrHqYH-DoEt!cqyH6LBLR0kHO!KQ~~_35.JPG

OR this,

drive-thru-tree-nr-Leggett.jpg

Guys and/or Lesbians, can figure something to do with it!

lik1.jpg

khjkhkhj,couples,black,,,white,black,and,white,couple,embrace-cab160a595bd9d03f7a5ac510b016ba5_h.jpg

But you're right on one thing. I 've never met a women that didn't prefer going to another woman doctor for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, it's a ying yang world. For every hot, shaved 19 year old College freshmen you get a nasty 73 year old with a yeast infection I imagine.

I guess if you pulled in 250k every year it might be worth it but do you think Dr. OBGYN goes home and goes down on the little woman? :smilielol5:

What's the difference than a guy looking at porn. Makes him want to go "hit it"! :eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, it's a ying yang world. For every hot, shaved 19 year old College freshmen you get a nasty 73 year old with a yeast infection I imagine.

I guess if you pulled in 250k every year it might be worth it but do you think Dr. OBGYN goes home and goes down on the little woman? :smilielol5:

$250k??

poo son, that aint poo for an OBGYN. So in that respect, i guess its worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I prefer a male obgyn over a female one. I've never had any creepy ones. When I was pregnant I was seen by lots of men and women ones and I didn't care for any of the women obgyns. They were kind of cold and less compassionate. Might just depend on the person not the sex of the person.

I love my obgyn. He is a cajun around 35 years old and super nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it depends on the doctor/nurse. Some male docs I have seen have been pretty worthless and insensitive. They don't get a speculum wedging their lady parts and pinching their cooters. I would like shove that up their bungholes so they gain perspective. I have had more women doctors be very senstive to the patient being displayed on the exam table like a trussed turkey. I have also had bitchy nurse practitioners who make you feel like poo if you have any questions. It's both. It sucks to have to be there every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well when I get a physical I request females just because it feels more natural than a male, but they are pretty bitchy and not very gentle either so I don't think it is a sex thing more of a good doctor/bad doctor thing. This is why it is so hard (and important) to find a good doctor you trust regardless of them being a man or a woman.

I am not trying to sound racist but I would be weary of races being doctors for two reasons. Some foreigners have a weird doctor degree but not an equivalent. Secondly, I am pretty sure there is a race/handicap hiring quota for them like any other establishment. Had someone look at a suspicious mole on me and tell me it's absolutely nothing. Found out a month later it was cancer and needed to be removed by a free doctor in the park. I truly believe that doctor was only there becasue of his race. I called him back and wouldn't you know he no longer worked there.

It is a shame that establishments are forced to hire some people even though they aren't qualified for a fear of a lawsuit or an organization that will be alerted. You can be suspected of being a racist all you want when turning a doctor away becasue they seem suspicious but this is your health, it isn't worth being polite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I understand the concerns--he is not P. Sewell or Joe Thomas.  He has technique issues and was not great in the run game and was good in pass protection when UGA did not pass much.  Then there is the immediate need vs long term need perspective.   I did not see Freeland being there-frankly. Here is why:   He has nearly 35" arms and his hands are large (10.5").  He ran a 4.93 40 at the combine.  He is very agile.  His vertical was 33.5".   Physically, he is a freak. He is 21 and he seems very intelligent (coachable). You have to remember, some of these rookies are 24, 25 years old. Freeling is A team player.  His shortcomings are fixable.  Short arms (as with the kids from Utah and Miami) are not fixable.  The Run on OTs began at #9: Fano (picked 10 picks earlier) has 32" arms and his hands are 9".  He did not play in the SEC like Freeling.  Many think the short arms project him to guard. Mauigoa (picked 10th) has 33" arms.  He is a solid player, but his arms make him borderline as a T (they seek 34" and up as ideal)  Kayden Proctor (picked 12th overall) struggled in pass protection and projects by many to RT or G.  Weight management is a concern. So it is possible that Freeling will be the first LT taken who actually plays LT.  (he also has the ability and experience to play RT)  His questions are fixable and not limited to physical limitations.  Here is the question:  If you know that you need a Tackle, and you could choose between all four of these players, who would you pick? I am not sure that Freeling would not be the player I selected if given the opportunity to take any of them.
    • The more I think about this pick the more I like it. The Icky injury might end up being a blessing in disguise for everyone except Icky unfortunately. If Freeling pans out at LT the Panthers have a good player on a rookie contract at a premium position at a time when they’re going to need to potentially pay Bryce for his next contract. Icky was likely going to command a big salary jump for his next contract and now, there’s a strong justification he’s not going to be worth a big money extension until he rehabs and proves he can still play at a high level. Since he’s finishing his rookie deal this season, it will be interesting to see if the Panthers bring him back for the 2027 season. Obviously it’s too early to say and they will probably wait to see how the season pans out with Moton still elite but aging and clearly battling persistent injuries, and they need to see if Freeling can develop into a starter during his rookie year. But ultimately this might have opened up a huge chunk of salary cap for the next 4-5 years. 
    • You read my mind Nastradamus! If Rodriguez is still there I feel like it will be hard to pass on him. And one of these TE we keep drafting have to hit eventually and Delp is just as good as the others.
×
×
  • Create New...