Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It could be worse...


Highlandfire

Recommended Posts

We could be Buffalo that keeps a coach that goes 7-9 three years in a row because the medling 90 (yes folks 90...) year old owner is too cheap to pay for a real coach and to affraid to hire a real GM. There are other examples like Detroit etal as well.

I am not happy with the staff nor with Delhomme, but things could be much worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course it could be worse, but when we've made the playoffs in the past we have been relatively successful and we had never been bounced before the NFC championship. So to see us get dominated on both sides of the ball the way we did by the Cardinals sends everyone into an uproar, well mostly everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think many people are complaining about the owner of the team...........

Matter of fact, I don't think I have read anything anywhere that complains or bashes JR.

Im not complaining about the big cat just agreeing with the OP in that it could be much worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think many people are complaining about the owner of the team...........

Matter of fact, I don't think I have read anything anywhere that complains or bashes JR.

I am talking the overall situation could be worse. I do wish JR had stepped in already and forced some changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Living in Bengals country I can tell you that it could be very much worse. Mike Brown, since taking over the team in 1990, has run that franchise into the ground. Unlike JR he is not interested in placing a competitive product on the field. All he does is take advantage of the revenue sharing to make his wallet fatter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...