Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rae Carruth to get a new trail?


charlotte49er

Recommended Posts

If you can, change the spelling to "trial."

And while we're at it, all it is is his attorneys saying they should throw out what Cherica Adams said because she wasn't alive for a cross-examination. Well, she wasn't alive for it because he had Van Brett Watkins kill her.

Thanks, I was in a hurry. My real estate agent was coming over for me to sign the revised papers on my new place.

I was pre-law once upon a time. It seems to me that testimony can be allowed if the person isn't alive. Usually it falls back on transcripts form a previous trail, or in cases that the testimony would put the person in imminent danger of their life. It's close, if she wasn't deposed as a witness. If could be ruled as "hear say". Seeming as the judge allowed it in the first trail, re-trail judges as less likely to over turn it. (Doesn't mean that it doesn't happen.)

He got 18-24 years and not the death penalty. Most states, if you get the death penalty, cases are automatically kicked to an appellate court for review.

I found the Link:

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/10/26/1787849/carruth-lawyers-ask-today-for.html

The man is a scam bag IMO. He should have gotten more. Again, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...