Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Crew chief shake-up at HMS

Goosfraba21

By Goosfraba21,
in Charlotte Football Club

Recommended Posts

Goosfraba21 Newbie

Goosfraba21

Posted
Posted

http://sports.espn.go.com/rpm/nascar/cup/news/story?id=5843855

HOMESTEAD, Fla. -- Hendrick Motorsports made a major crew chief and organizational shakeup on Tuesday for drivers Dale Earnhardt Jr., Jeff Gordon and Mark Martin.

Earnhardt will work with Steve Letarte, who has been Gordon's crew chief since he replaced Robbie Loomis late in the 2005 season. Gordon will be paired with Alan Gustafson, who has been Martin's crew chief

“

Earnhardt It's pretty obvious we aren't very good and we need to do some things to get better. It's obvious that's where we are. I don't think it needs to be over-analyzed or anything like that.

” --Dale Earnhardt Jr.

Lance McGrew will move from Earnhardt to Martin.

The only combination left untouched was Jimmie Johnson and Chad Knaus, who on Sunday won their fifth straight championship.

In addition, Earnhardt's team will move into the facility that builds cars for Johnson. Gordon's cars will share a facility with Martin's, marking the first time since Johnson's team went full time in 2002 that it was not housed in Gordon's shop.

"This will improve us as an organization, across the board," team owner Rick Hendrick said in a statement. "We had a championship season, but we weren't where we wanted and needed to be with all four teams. We've made the right adjustments, and I'm excited to go racing with this lineup."

While Johnson won six races and the title, Gordon, Earnhardt and Martin went winless and only Gordon made the Chase, finishing ninth. Martin finished 13th and Earnhardt 21st.

The move is as close as Hendrick could get to pairing Earnhardt with Knaus, who will work hand-in-hand with Letarte on turning around NASCAR's most popular driver.

"It's pretty obvious we aren't very good and we need to do some things to get better,'' Earnhardt said last weekend at Homestead-Miami Speedway. "It's obvious that's where we are. I don't think it needs to be over-analyzed or anything like that.

"The last couple of years have been hard. We've been bad. We ain't run good. I ain't run good. It's been real hard to deal with. . . . I still feel some confidence in what I can do. I guess I'm just glad that's still there, you know?''

No further comment was available, but Hendrick will discuss the shakeup more on Wednesday.

So I guess we get to watch Jr. fail with another crew chief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By TD alt · Posted

      In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • TD alt
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By TD alt · Posted

      Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • jfra78
      Are all veterinarians this greedy ?

      By jfra78 · Posted

      Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...