-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
-
-
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
-
I get that you're taking the pragmatic approach here, and on the surface it makes sense, especially because yes, that's exactly what the Vikings should have done. But again, the factor you're leaving out is that we drafted Bryce #1 overall, that's what changes everything in the scenario. You just can't take a QB #1 overall, have him not play well the first 4 years, draft his replacement, and then still keep him as the starting QB for that 5th season. Beyond all the problems it could cause if Bryce plays well, it also just creates an awkward locker room situation that you wouldn't want to throw that rookie into as well as what it does to the rest of the team. I'm not going to try and research it, but I'd be SHOCKED if there is a single instance of this happening in NFL history with a QB that was drafted in the 1st round alone, let alone 1st overall, as no team is dumb enough to do that. -
If the win less than 8 games this season someone is losing their job.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.