Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Larkin for Aho


Anybodyhome
 Share

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, DavidEng said:

Defense. Although +/- is influenced by the team, that’s a helluva difference between Aho and Larkin.

IMG_1502.jpeg.e80d481e15d265edb44c6672b4c5a03d.jpeg

Absolutely. But without dogging into goal differentials over 10 years, think of it this way- Larkin has played in 5 playoff games in his career while Aho has 104. 

One has to take team success into account when looking at +/-. Hell, the team was a -132 for the season, and the roster is full of negative +/- stash for the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

Absolutely. But without dogging into goal differentials over 10 years, think of it this way- Larkin has played in 5 playoff games in his career while Aho has 104. 

One has to take team success into account when looking at +/-. Hell, the team was a -132 for the season, and the roster is full of negative +/- stash for the year.

If your own eyes and everything you’ve read don’t tell you Aho is a better defensive player, I don’t know what else to tell you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DavidEng said:

If your own eyes and everything you’ve read don’t tell you Aho is a better defensive player, I don’t know what else to tell you. 

I don't really care about the defensive abilities of a top line guy who is supposed to be a goal scorer.

Matter of fact, defense is probably behind scoring/assists, face offs, playmaking and puck possession on the priority list.

Whatever, DE, like I said, it's my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anybodyhome said:

I don't really care about the defensive abilities of a top line guy who is supposed to be a goal scorer.

Matter of fact, defense is probably behind scoring/assists, face offs, playmaking and puck possession on the priority list.

Whatever, DE, like I said, it's my opinion.

wow.ok 😄

Edited by DavidEng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anybodyhome said:

I don't really care about the defensive abilities of a top line guy who is supposed to be a goal scorer.

Matter of fact, defense is probably behind scoring/assists, face offs, playmaking and puck possession on the priority list.

Whatever, DE, like I said, it's my opinion.

I will say. The teams that win cups have forwards that forecheck and have strong defense.  Larkin doesn’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...