Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NBA Playoffs Rd 1: Chicago Bulls vs. Indiana Pacers


King Taharqa

Recommended Posts

Rose is a beast at driving to the basket and today he showed just why he was the MVP. There were times where you'd think there wasn't enough space but he'd be able to split players. His weakness of his overall game is his outside shooting, and that was evidenced today. But really he has improved vastly from his previous years. Rose's on-ball defense is also not the greatest as we saw Collison and even AJ Price get there looks.

I think that this loss for the Pacers might do some damage to their psyche. Tough game to lose. Every time the Bulls made a run they always seems to have an answer until the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indiana played damn good, especially Psycho T, but Rose went into beast mode and Chicago started hitting all of their perimet shoots.... That's what makes chicago good... Rose ability to get to the whole with chicago's ability to knock down three's in clutch situations.

LOVE THE NBA PLayoffs this year!!!

But Indiana is showing how to play on the big stage when you get a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that proves why the Bulls won't win it all. Not gonna be able to make that comeback against teams like Boston/Miami/LA/Dallas/SA/OKC/Denver...I think you get the picture.

Granger is right, they go as Rose goes. All you gotta do is stop him, which is proving impossible.

And that would be why they can win it all.

Some teams stars showed up, others did not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm arguing that should those supposed deficiencies, like height or pocket footwork, be as consequential as you and others have claimed, then there would be a clear, observable impact in the data. That's not unreasonable. For example, batted passes are often used as a size-related concern (see: Baker Mayfield), yet Bryce ranked among the lowest in deflections at the line. If his stature is such a limitation, why isn't it showing up there? Or are you suggesting that's why his passing yards fall short of your expectations? If the latter, I would hope that you're not discounting yards left on the field due to drops (of which he led the league in).  Also, asking for specific, measurable benchmarks isn't aggression... it's accountability. If that feels uncomfortable, it might be worth reflecting on how much of your anti-Bryce argument is grounded in subjective perception rather than objective metrics. So, again: do you have any specific KPIs beyond total passing yardage, height, and weight that you consider relevant to evaluating whether a QB is top-10? If you want to add YPA and passing yards per game to those metrics, that's fair, just be clear about it. But let's not pretend that asking for clarity is some kind of provocation. I'm simply trying to understand the actual criteria... not just the vibes.
    • Jackson actually played quite well for a #2 CB #54 in PFF coverage ratings 12 pass break ups solid in run defense..... Hes gonna be targeted just because Jacyee IS being avoided.
    • Yeah, these arguments are getting twisted to the point that it's just an airing of old grievances for the 100th time. No matter what happened in the past, no matter what the "trajectory" is, Bryce has to show why he was a number 1 overall draft pick.  If people didn't like Cam and what he did for us at QB, I hate to see what poor Bryce is gonna get if he doesn't reach Manning-esque heights. 
×
×
  • Create New...