Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina- Legitimate Contender


doahniconti

Recommended Posts

After the Nation has had the chance to see Carolina beat the numero cuatros defense in the league, people can see that they are as good as their record shows: 10-3. The team, even when faced by adversity the team has come back a number of times late in games. And like last night at Monday Night Foozball, when the air game was not working well (not up to super bowl/playoff standards) the team went back to what they do best-running the ball. Also, both RBs are getting better statistically as the season goes on, and lets not forget that Jake Delhomme has a 93.8 passer rating in the playoffs. That is a significant jump in rating from what has in the reg. season: 84. Carolina's Defense has made big plays when they were needed for the most part throughout the season as well. So all-in-all does Carolina have a chance of making this THEE year to win the superbowl??

PLEASE POST COMMENTS IN RESPONSE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After the Nation has had the chance to see Carolina beat the numero cuatros defense in the league, people can see that they are as good as their record shows: 10-3. The team, even when faced by adversity the team has come back a number of times late in games. And like last night at Monday Night Foozball, when the air game was not working well (not up to super bowl/playoff standards) the team went back to what they do best-running the ball. Also, both RBs are getting better statistically as the season goes on, and lets not forget that Jake Delhomme has a 93.8 passer rating in the playoffs. That is a significant jump in rating from what has in the reg. season: 84. Carolina's Defense has made big plays when they were needed for the most part throughout the season as well. So all-in-all does Carolina have a chance of making this THEE year??

PLEASE POST COMMENTS IN RESPONSE.

Congratulations! It seems you have recently discovered the internet. It can be a large and overwhelming place sometimes, but just stick with it and you'll get the hang of it.

I suggest starting here:

http://www.googobits.com/articles/332-a-guide-to-internet-forums.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations! It seems you have recently discovered the internet. It can be a large and overwhelming place sometimes, but just stick with it and you'll get the hang of it.

I suggest starting here:

http://www.googobits.com/articles/332-a-guide-to-internet-forums.html

what are you talking about man? You quote my review and make a retarded joke...? lol do yourself a favor and go to movies.com to start an argument.. because you'll get one there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...