Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More foreign makes in NASCAR?

Spike

By Spike,
in Charlotte Football Club

Recommended Posts

hmsmike Newbie

hmsmike

Posted
Posted

Yeah, the COT pretty much makes it seem like a firm starting ground.. but that car (technically) for a "new brand" wouldn't be anything like their factory tested cars.... thusly they'd be "new" and have the first season to get their (technically) testing in... but, while in a race, I'd gather.

"There's Nothing Stock about a Stock Car, Cole!"

:D

DaysofThunder.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Spike Newbie

Spike

Posted
  • Author
Posted

To go along with the foreign cars, the aforementioned Pontiac I would like to see make a comeback. I postulated that it would take a 3rd party buying them out, but with GM's poor run lately, and the downsizing of every brand(including Pontiac), I could see them putting Pontiac back out there themselves to bring more exposure to the company as a whole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Shamrock Newbie

Shamrock

Posted
Posted

And that statement right there is why a start up team will suck their first year in competition!!!

This where I need a "Hell Yeah" from Red Wing!

Amanda --- Where are you?!?! :D

There is more adjustablity in these COT's than you would think, but yes not as much as the old Monte Carlo's. :(

and don't let the media fool ya into believing that the teams just need a handfull of cars because of their universal fit from Short Track to Super Speedway ..... We still have at least 14 cars per team! :rolleyes:

:P

HEEEEELLLLLLLYEAAAAH!!!!!

Sorry!!! Been offline in la-la-land for a while! :coolgleamA:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By strato · Posted

      Okay then. To me that means Russell Wilson was Coryell. Because I see the proposition completely in the Russell Wilson punt/pass put it up for grabs mold. Count on the receiver to catch it or knock it down.    And the reason I thought that was the intent with Legette is the abysmal downfield game from 2023. As in, there was barely any.   I look at it as if… the result of a deep attempt isn’t as important as the opponent understanding they have to defend it. So I was all for some 50/50s. Coryell, Walsh whoever.  I do favor the Coryell approach personally but also very much value versatility, it doesn’t have to be strict. Just make the defense defend the whole field, however you do it. It has to include downfield throws.     
    • Mr. Scot
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By Mr. Scot · Posted

      Sold, or in the process of being sold. Could be either way. Consider this for a second... Last season, our defensive coordinator steered what many have called the worst defense in NFL history.  Canales would absolutely have been justified in firing him, and no one would have blamed him if he had.  But what did he do? He gave Evero another chance to come back and prove he could be better. Does that tell us something about Canales? I think it does. Now apply that to Bryce 😕
    • CRA
      Why does Bryce get the blame?

      By CRA · Posted

      Canales has never been part of big YAC offenses in the NFL.  That’s not his tree.  Not in Seattle, Tampa or here.  Every O he has been associated with basically has been bottom half of the league in YAC.  That’s what Bryce needs to happen though  2 very different things….and very much gets into why the middle school QB doesn’t fit 
×
×
  • Create New...