Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The end of the NFL as we know it!


Recommended Posts

It is not the league, it is the players. I personally do not want to be in the WAC, so that while the Panthers make the championship game they automatically get their @$$ handed to them by default.

Who would give a mid-size market team a lucrative contract to compete? Bojangles or Harris Teeter?

If this scenario played out, the Panthers wouldn't be in Charlotte for long. We'd get smacked around for a few years and the stadium would grow emptier by the Sunday. Why would Bojangles sign up for that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm shocked Fiz lasted this long....I'd have hung myself.

While I agree that a free market would clearly regulate itself, I don't think it will happen. I have felt all along that if this ruling happened, the owners would simply concede to some of the players demands in order to keep the draft/salary cap.

Fiz:

You don't think the unique makeup of professional sports leagues should be an exception to the anti-trust laws? You know you can still be a free market capitalist and believe in exceptions, right? Not saying I think they should be (not educated enough on the laws) but its an interesting discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether or not I am capable of paying to go to these games is irrelevant to the topic. You are senile to believe that the popularity of the NFL will not go down. I'd equate what we would witness to F1 and Indy Car, two prime examples of a sport where revenue directly correlates to the results on the tracks weekly. Both of which barely are alive from their glory days. Both direct results of uncapped, unlimited funding. If this is the path you wish to go down, you will be cheering (or not) for the LA Panthers.

The NBA another great example. A league with a salary cap, but you can exceed it so long as the teams is willing to paying a luxury tax over the cap. Look at who wins year in and year out. The teams with the most funding. The declining popularity of the NBA speaks for itself.

Sure, you have a heart warming story like the Giants or Marlins occasionally in MLB, but this is the exact model you have in that sport. Look at the teams that traditionally dominate in and out every year. Yankees, Red Sox, Philllies, Angels, and Texas. I will lose interest in the NFL if this is the path it takes. I don't particularly care for the 3 other major American sports nor NASCAR as its went the same route.

To each his own..

The Spurs are a terribly funded team (relative to other perennial winners) who is never among the highest spending teams in the NBA. What they do is draft better than any other team and keep those guys there.

And win 4 titles in the past 12 years, while making the playoffs every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fact is, the draft and the salary cap have made the NFL the most popular sport in the US because they have created parody among all 32 teams. Getting rid of the draft and the salary cap would greatly diminish the appeal of the NFL for the majority of fans.

Truth is, the players want the cap and the draft because the majority of players are not elite talent and with no draft they are doomed to be stuck on crappy teams and without the cap there is also no floor.

You see this is where people saying this is only scare tactic on both sides are wrong. The players and owners are no longer in control of this situation. The lawyers are. And who makes more money if there is no draft or salary cap? The lawyers (aka agents) will be rolling in money for years over these lawsuits. And the agents (aka lawyers) don't care about the draft because with the new system they will be able to shop their clients around to everyteam not just negociate with the one that drafted them.

The owners and players have been pawns in a lot of this. For that I blame the owners and players. But before they know they won't be able to go back to the system that want due to the courts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Spurs are a terribly funded team (relative to other perennial winners) who is never among the highest spending teams in the NBA. What they do is draft better than any other team and keep those guys there.

And win 4 titles in the past 12 years, while making the playoffs every year.

Again, loss for the Panthers. We traded up for Armanti f*cking Edwards. Not exactly a Spur-like move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, loss for the Panthers. We traded up for Armanti f*cking Edwards. Not exactly a Spur-like move.

And you shouldnt be able to make moves like that and not suffer consequences. Much like if we follow that move by drafting a 3/4 round project #1 overall and he busts. You never see the Patriots or Spurs missing so badly on high picks.

We could learn a thing or two from such teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol i cant do this anymore

it was a good run.. surprised so many people failed to catch on.

Fiz does raise an interesting point even though it is a troll. Hypothetically if the league went this way, each team would negotiate their own TV deals, uniform rights, shoe deals, etc. The NFL would be like the NCAA but not as corrupt. Carolina, Jax, Cincy, Buffalo, and Atlanta would be like the WAC while Dallas, Washington, and the other big market teams would be the SEC.

no one can argue how billionaire's (Goodell's write up this AM) points to regulating the free market, which is in fact ironic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it was a good run.. surprised so many people failed to catch on.

no one can argue how billionaire's (Goodell's write up this AM) points to regulating the free market, which is in fact ironic.

Well the key to successful trolling is being able to maintain it throughout. I figured he would quit eventually and he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as an advocate of the free market, I'm glad that finally the special considerations that have impeded the natural flow of economics are finally being done away with.

This is NOT A FREE MARKET

The Govt. Dictating via Fiat against the private property rights of Owners is not a "Free Market", its the total opposite by definition.

The Feds and Union have pissed on Private Property Rights and not allowing the owners to Self-Govern and Regulate the NFL as they see best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no one can argue how billionaire's (Goodell's write up this AM) points to regulating the free market, which is in fact ironic.

not allowing the owners within the NFL to self-regulate and instead having the Government force against their will the setup of the NFL, is not a "Free Market" by definition. The Government is interfering in the actions of private entities.

The NFL owners collectively agreeing to setup their business/industry in a way that allows for the allocation of players/employees, salary caps, revenue sharing, etc to make their overall product better....is their Freedom(hence Free Market).

The Govt. and non-ownership Players Union using coercion to alter that is by definition not a 'free market'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

due to the anti-trust exemption that has just been done away with.

it is clearly about to exist in the nfl and i for one welcome it's arrival.

perhaps it will serve as an example to the IT industry.

I completely understand and agree with your free market and economics analysis of the NFL. You are spot on in that regard.

But, this WILL destroy the NFL as we know it and WILL be detrimental to the game. To WELCOME that as you say is perplexing to say the least.

As a fan of the game, I would not WELCOME a situation that will destroy the product that I love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well if you agree with the philosophy but acknowledge that it hurts something you care about and are emotionally invested in, perhaps it's time to reevaluate...something something im having trouble connecting the dots here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...