Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Wants #2 Jersey From Clausen

Proudiddy

By Proudiddy,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

MWCarolina Newbie

MWCarolina

Posted
Posted

Unlike others I dont want Jimmy traded. I dont want him to play, ever, but he has zero trade value so no trade needed. I do think he should give up #2.

why should Clausen just give up his #2????? IF Cam wants it so bad (and i dont think he wants it as bad as people are making it) he will pay for it and Clausen will accept. As for keeping, him, i dont think it's wise to keep him, what if Newton got hurt and Clausen had to play and played better than people think, i say trade him for nothing and keep either Moore or get a vet in.

As for the jersey in the picture, it's either fake or just a draft jersey as someone said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chef17 Apprentice

chef17

Posted
Posted

why should Clausen just give up his #2????? IF Cam wants it so bad (and i dont think he wants it as bad as people are making it) he will pay for it and Clausen will accept. As for keeping, him, i dont think it's wise to keep him, what if Newton got hurt and Clausen had to play and played better than people think, i say trade him for nothing and keep either Moore or get a vet in.

As for the jersey in the picture, it's either fake or just a draft jersey as someone said.

So having a young backup who played well when the starter got injured is a bad thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MWCarolina Newbie

MWCarolina

Posted
Posted

So having a young backup who played well when the starter got injured is a bad thing?

yeah it creates a QB controversy, you dont want QB controversies. As good as it worked out for the Chargers with Rivers, you should also remember that they lost Brees for nothing. personally, i think you should try to trade Jimmy to Seattle who Carroll wanted at USC and then get a vet to help Newton and you still have Moore on that one year tender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chef17 Apprentice

chef17

Posted
Posted

yeah it creates a QB controversy, you dont want QB controversies. As good as it worked out for the Chargers with Rivers, you should also remember that they lost Brees for nothing. personally, i think you should try to trade Jimmy to Seattle who Carroll wanted at USC and then get a vet to help Newton and you still have Moore on that one year tender.

In that situation Clausen would have good trade value. Trading him now is worthless. So instead of trading a guy who has good trade value we should trade him when he has no value? That makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ares d9 Newbie

Ares d9

Posted
Posted

yeah it creates a QB controversy, you dont want QB controversies. As good as it worked out for the Chargers with Rivers, you should also remember that they lost Brees for nothing. personally, i think you should try to trade Jimmy to Seattle who Carroll wanted at USC and then get a vet to help Newton and you still have Moore on that one year tender.

What a moonbat.

If Jimmy performs well he will either be used as trade bait or retained as our back-up QB. Cam Newton is the man in Carolina regardless of what Jimmy does, there is nothing he can do to create controversy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cat'sGrowl Newbie

Cat'sGrowl

Posted
Posted

What a moonbat.

If Jimmy performs well he will either be used as trade bait or retained as our back-up QB. Cam Newton is the man in Carolina regardless of what Jimmy does, there is nothing he can do to create controversy.

That's the absolute most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MWCarolina Newbie

MWCarolina

Posted
Posted

In that situation Clausen would have good trade value. Trading him now is worthless. So instead of trading a guy who has good trade value we should trade him when he has no value? That makes no sense.

not really. people would KNOW that he would be cut soon. think about it like this. what kind of trade happened with Drew Brees??? how about Derek Anderson??? it's a good move for Carolina if both turn into great QBs because then you have a choice on who to keep, BUT you likely wont get a trade. the value is already down because of Newton being on the team.

That's the absolute most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.

i agree, quarterback controversies happen ALL the time. people didnt expect Derek Anderson to start all that time. people didnt think Warner would create a QB controversy with Leinart and Michael Vick wasnt expected to take the Eagles job last year, the job was supposed to be Kolb, then Kolb got hurt and Vick took the Eagles job and never let it go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chef17 Apprentice

chef17

Posted
Posted

not really. people would KNOW that he would be cut soon. think about it like this. what kind of trade happened with Drew Brees??? how about Derek Anderson??? it's a good move for Carolina if both turn into great QBs because then you have a choice on who to keep, BUT you likely wont get a trade. the value is already down because of Newton being on the team.

i agree, quarterback controversies happen ALL the time. people didnt expect Derek Anderson to start all that time. people didnt think Warner would create a QB controversy with Leinart and Michael Vick wasnt expected to take the Eagles job last year, the job was supposed to be Kolb, then Kolb got hurt and Vick took the Eagles job and never let it go.

False. Clausen has 3 years left on his contract. If he played well next year, Panthers would still have him for 2 years. Either a team would trade for him, or he would stay on our roster.

I don't understand your argument. We don't want Clausen to play well if Newton gets injured? Well every NFL coach must be wrong because I guarantee they all want a backup QB who can play well if the starter gets hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MWCarolina Newbie

MWCarolina

Posted
Posted

False. Clausen has 3 years left on his contract. If he played well next year, Panthers would still have him for 2 years. Either a team would trade for him, or he would stay on our roster. I don't understand your argument. We don't want Clausen to play well if Newton gets injured? Well every NFL coach must be wrong because I guarantee they all want a backup QB who can play well if the starter gets hurt.

if he's STILL on the roster after playing well than you have the QB controversy, i think it's risky to have QB controversys and no one will trade for him when they KNOW he will be free to have in 2 years. look at Brees, no team traded for him. the point i am trying to make is why keep Clausen??? everyone wanted him gone last year, a team may want him as their future now and may be stupid enough to offer a 5th round pick. Seattle would likely take him on, doubt Washington would due to the fact they like big armed QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Derrick Brown appreciation thread.

      By TD alt · Posted

      Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • SmokinwithWilly
      Joe Person: Ickey is expected to be extended, Mays is someone we want to keep long term, TE, LB and OLB are our biggest needs heading into the offseason

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • Shocker
      2025 College Football Thread

      By Shocker · Posted

      I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...