Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Revised Dates if CBA is reached today

The Other Colbert

Recommended Posts

The Other Colbert Newbie

The Other Colbert

Posted
Posted

Saturday

• Voluntary training, conditioning and classroom instruction permitted until first day of clubs' preseason camps.

• Pre-2011 league year period commences. 2011 free agency list to be issued and will become effective on the first day of the 2011 league year (July 27).

• Clubs/players may begin to renegotiate contracts. Clubs may begin to sign drafted rookies and their own UFAs, RFAs, exclusive rights players and franchise players.

• Waivers begin for the 2011 league year.

• Starting at 2 p.m. ET, clubs may negotiate with, but not sign, undrafted rookie free agents, free agents, and other clubs' UFAs, RFAs, and franchise players.

Sunday

• Starting at 2 p.m ET, clubs may begin to sign undrafted rookie free agents.

Wednesday

• 2011 league year commences at 2 p.m. ET, provided NFLPA has ratified CBA.

• Free agency signing period begins. Clubs may sign free agents and other clubs' UFAs.

• Clubs may sign offer sheets.

• Trading period begins.

• All clubs must be under the salary cap.

• Top 51 rule applies.

• Rosters expanded to 90-man limit.

• Training camps open for all clubs, provided NFLPA has ratified CBA. Day 1 activities limited to physicals, meetings, and conditioning. No pads permitted on Day 2 or Day 3.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/6793054/nfl-lockout-nflpa-discussing-owners-proposed-deal

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nicbsbll2 Newbie

Nicbsbll2

Posted
Posted

Wednesday• 2011 league year commences at 2 p.m. ET, provided NFLPA has ratified CBA.

Hold on, does this mean that players can start reporting tomorrow whether they have voted on the CBA yet or not, just as long as the players have it ratified by Wednesday??

edit: Damn, never mind. Should have read the article first

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Soul Rebel
      Cam Jackson

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I hope he finds his lane in year 2.  Now that we signed Walker, I'm really intrigued how Dan feels about the DL. Is there a piece there in R1 that presents value/BPA and fills a void for one of the spots w/ DB and Wharton.  I'll give Wharton another year to show us why he was signed here. With A'Shawn gone, I don't think BBIII is it.  Our edges are set and our LBs are balanced. Horn/Mike Jack and Moehrig will hold the secondary together. DB is, well...DB.  However, I think this is an area that is the biggest question mark right now. I see 1 of 3 spots that are locked and loaded for us. If we move to a 4 down front, I assume Phillips would slide down to be the additional linemen, but we still have questions about the other two spots in either scheme.  I'd feel better with a tradeback, but I do wonder how McDonald would do here. Maybe Woods....but McDonald really does peek my interest.  Or, can Jackson take that next step. The coaching staff speaks highly of him for what little he played. Here's hoping he stays healthy and comes into TC with something to prove. There's a spot to be taken, here's hoping he takes it.
    • MHS831
      Cam Jackson

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Not many people talking about DT, but we have a need.  (DE)  Now this guy is a NT like Brown III
    • SmokinwithWilly
      At this point its Sadiq or bust... A

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      But is it about letting Bryce develop or about winning games? Bryce has not been good enough to be an uncontested starter. He just hasn't. How many times has last drive Bryce shown up for 4 entire quarters? Once in 3 seasons? You aren't going to win 9 or 10 one score games every season year in and year out. You may want Bryce in the last 2 minutes. I want that Bryce the full 60.  No one is saying you have to give up on him, but bringing in another QB that can do anything is not hindering Bryce. It helps the team and that's where the focus needs to be. If drafting Sadiq to plague the middle of the field would help out offense, but Bryce struggles to get pass into the middle of the field, is Sadiq a bad pick? Or could he be a good pick with a better option at QB? We can't be afraid to improve. QB, TE, OL, LB, DL, CB, S. It doesn't matter. The goal is SBs, not 5 to 8 years seeing waiting to see if Bryce can develop while the rest of the league keeps passing us by.  Sadiq is a nice option, but I think we have to address tackle if one we like is there because we are painfully thin after this year, a LB to general the field, and a true ball hawking safety that can set the tone in the secondary. Those 3 positions are bigger game changers than a TE that will likely struggle to make a round 1 impact in this offense. 
×
×
  • Create New...