Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who is better than Steve Smith in his prime?


OneBadassCat

Recommended Posts

Did you ever see Harrison play?

I have. Have you ever seen a receiver not post great numbers with Manning as his qb? Last season said it all. With all the injuries the Colts suffered at the WR position, Manning still managed to put up great numbers with backups as his starters.

Look at the ridiculous numbers Jacob Tamme posted last season when Dallas Clark went down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have. Have you ever seen a receiver not post great numbers with Manning as his qb? Last season said it all. With all the injuries the Colts suffered at the WR position, Manning still managed to put up great numbers with backups as his starters.

Look at the ridiculous numbers Jacob Tamme posted last season when Dallas Clark went down.

A lot of people put Marvin Harrison in the top 5 of all time receivers. I don't think I've seen Steve Smith make the top 25 in any list. See if you can find one other than your own list.

I've attached a link as an example. Harrison is number TWO on this list.http://bleacherreport.com/articles/330608-the-100-greatest-wide-receivers-in-nfl-history-nos-25-1/page/25

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought Muhsin Muhammed was a pretty darn good receiver in his prime. Thanks for straightening me out on that.

Moose left after the 2004 season, the year before Steve Smith grabbed the league by the balls. And when he returned, I think we can all agree he was washed up and for the most part a non factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of people put Marvin Harrison in the top 5 of all time receivers. I don't think I've seen Steve Smith make the top 25 in any list. See if you can find one other than your own list.

I've attached a link as an example. Harrison is number TWO on this list.http://bleacherreport.com/articles/330608-the-100-greatest-wide-receivers-in-nfl-history-nos-25-1/page/25

You do realize those lists are based on stats right? Give Harrison the QBs Smith had and Harrison wouldn't have those same numbers. I'm not arguing who had a better career, but a list doesn't prove who was a better WR in their prime which is what the OP asked

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You would hope so. I’m confused why the sports world seems split on Bryce when he’s obviously not working out. 
    • So let’s do the reverse? Make everyone agree everything he does is a disaster? I also think the whole “gaslighting” is on the eye of the beholder. It went from he can’t avoid one single sack countered with he actually did that well Sunday (with data backing it) to a little breakdown of why he is so bad. People are going to have different opinions. I’m also not going to pretend this wasn’t happening Day one with this little QB. 
    • All this great stuff he has done, how often does he do it?  I have it at three or four games out of 14 where he was very good and then you get a drive here or a series there where there are some good things. Here is the gaslight part: everyone has put him on a curve with his first year the baseline, neglecting to understand how bad he was then. Even if he comes back twice as good, where does that really leave him? 25th ranked or thereabouts.     He had so far to go, and still does, it is a Major ‘settle’ to accept his play as worthy of giving him our future.  You want to settle when the Bucs have Mayfield, and the Saints have overtaken us at QB? We will be third in the division at QB. That is good enough for y’all?  
×
×
  • Create New...