Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

1st half observations


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

in cam's defense:

1) anderson knows this offense better than any player on the roster

2) he's playing against 3rd stringers at best.

anderson is the dark horse to start really, he had a decent chance to start... if Jimmy doesn't show mastery of the offense anyway, which so far he has shown some decent ability with it. Cam of course starts if he's ready, but it may be he's not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jimmy pocket awareness is better then last year, and most sacks came from behind him when he was searching for a WR. He has made several good plays, only uber bad one was when he simply stared down Williams and threw the pick. But Jimmy doesn't get the full blame for that, Williams wasn't really watching for the ball.

I disagree, while his pick six was bad, it wasn't his worst play in my opinion. I can blame that INT on being under a lot of pressure and getting hit while throwing it. it was a bad pass, but he was trying to get it out to his safety valve.

no his worst play was his second or third drive when pierre paul sacked him from behind. gross had blocked him and turned him outside so much that he started coming at jimmy from the other side of the pocket. jimmy had about 5 yards all around him, and instead of stepping up in the pocket, he tried to scramble towards his right where pierre paul stuck his arm out and sacked the crap out of him.

the boy has no pocket awareness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He had a turnover on all three goals he was on the ice for. Plus he had that god awful delay of game penalty. Like legit his GS actually shows he was the cause of the loss and he was only on the ice for 12 minutes. You remove him from that game and the Canes win or at worst go to OT.  Let's put this in perspective, in 12 minutes he directly led to 3 goals against. In the 48 minutes without him on the ice it was an even-steven 2-2 game and that's disregarding that god awful delay of game penalty that led to goal number 4 of the 5 given up.      I don't see how anyone could say that he didn't directly lead to the loss.   
    • reality is the piling on of Frank Reich is just the standard huddle angle we take of putting all blame on someone after the fact.   as I was an OG Frank hater before it was cool to be......now the swing goes too far the other way and people will claim me is as a Frank defender.  Frank Reich was the definition of a .500 middle of the road NFL coach.  He technically was a winning coach and above .500 coming here but he is and was NFL average.  we were the biggest joke in a decade.....because they paired Frank Reich (a dude who was going to do what he does in the NFL) with a dude who couldn't do NFL basics and Frank was forced to play him.  That's not Frank being a loser.  That a bad org around Frank. 
    • Toronto is less physical than us, and they took them to 7  I really wish they would have won, because we match up better with them, but we have to deal with what we got  What worries me is Svech trying to take out Bob, that is desperation, that's what you do when you feel like there is no legit options left, it's what I feared, Bob is still in our core groups head, and they are over thinking, over passing Hopefully that changes tonight   
×
×
  • Create New...