Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marshall Faulk: Panthers Need To Commit To The Run


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

Marshall Faulk was just on NFLN, and for his "Marshall Plan" today he discussed our run game. Leading up to the segment, the story was titled "Trouble In Carolina?"

So, during the segment, Marshall said our problem is that opposing teams are (or at least were) determined to stop the run and make a rookie QB beat them. Furthermore, he said when we have run, the 10 guys outside of the ballcarrier haven't committed to the run and gave him a chance.

He then followed that up with a few different clips showing the "lack of commitment," with one clip being Legadu's whiff on a block on Adrian Wilson Week 1 that we all were heated about. The next clip was a read-option by Cam in which he showed the DE crashing down (which is Cam's key to hand it to the RB instead of keeping it) and Cam kept the ball and was tackled for a loss or right at the LOS.

Marshall said if Legadu would've sold out for the run and blocked his man with any kid of effort, Deangelo would've been able to cut it back and it would've went for a huge gain.

He also showed a clip against the Packers where Hangartner and Shockey lost the outside on a toss - this one doesn't bother me as bad, as it was the Packers and their front 7 is pretty good.

But all in all, good points. Again, I've stated in previous threads that I thought part of our problems with the run game was that our new philosophy isn't conducive to it - in Marshall's words, not committed. These clips showed it.

We're aggressive, but we aren't looking to pound teams to death anymore... But still, with our backs, we should've had more big plays to this point, I just think that our offense is more focused on the pass and the run is seen as secondary - so sometimes the effort is as well.

As we all know, Cam has done great and all indications are, he will be great long-term... With that established, I'm hoping the defenses know we can hurt them in the passing game now and we're smart about catching them off guard with the run now. I really think we should see some progress in the run game this week.

Once the run game gets up to speed, I actually think Cam will be even more effective. Just wanted to share...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope we pound the rock today. Regardless of whether its been working or not, you have to run the football to keep the Defense honest and off balance. I understand that the passing attack has been great , but is it too much to ask to give one of our running backs 15 carries?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We dont have to do anything but execute our game plan and make adjustments like we planned to do. I dont get why people think we HAVE to run the ball. . . I mean, yes, of course you do, but its not like anything good will come of forcing 40 carries if its not there for the taking. The beautiful thing is that Cam can throw and we have receivers who can catch. Take what the D gives you and light em long when they do something stupid.

If theyre gonna give us the run then so be it. Guess we'll see how much confidence Del Rio has in his D very shortly. My guess is that they drop into coverage all day, and we'll end up running it anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I agree with him to the extent that it would help keep defenses honest. Towards the end of the Packers game, they actually started dropping 8 guys into coverage. I just think our guys could be getting a lot more yards on runs if we executed better (I know, Captain Obvious).

If we executed better, then in turn, I think the red zone problems would be solved and it's possible Cam would look even better.

TBH, I love the passing attack and pass-oriented philosphy, and obviously Cam, Smitty, and the TEs are exciting to watch. I love the offense, but I think the balance will really benefit us to the max in terms of efficiency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Word. The run game needs to complement the passing game better. 2 yd carries or not. Just keep pushing the rock forward and our passing will take care of the rest. Strangely we've only seen Cam actually try to "take off" once when it wasn't by design. Even that could help to a degree if defenses are committed to playing coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we executed better, then in turn, I think the red zone problems would be solved and it's possible Cam would look even better.

Exactly. We need to get the run game going to help in the red zone. When we get inside the 5, the run should be a viable option, and not just with Cam on a QB keeper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...