Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Flex scheduling news thread


Boltergeist

Recommended Posts

Probably true. If Cincy and B'more win next week, they could make a case for moving that, but I wouldn't expect it.

That one could move to 4:15, or the TB-GB game. But with all the drama about what happened last time the Eagles played in NY, I can't see them flexing that one out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That one could move to 4:15, or the TB-GB game. But with all the drama about what happened last time the Eagles played in NY, I can't see them flexing that one out.

I'd say if CIN/BAL win, and the Giants are 3 up on the Eagles after next week, that's the best case for a flex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possible replacements:

- Panthers/Bucs (maybe 4pm game)

-Falcons/Texans

-Lions/Saints

-Packers/Giants

At first glance, I say Packers at Giants

Fox/CBS has the right to protect their big games, and I bet those teams already have the maximum primetime allotment. It's prolly either Falcons/Texans or us(Cam in primetime is a big allure no matter the record).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Individual teams may make no more than four appearances on NBC during the season. Only three teams may make as many as six prime time appearances (Sunday night, Monday night, and Thursday night combined).[18] The remaining teams may make a maximum of five prime time appearances. In addition, there are no restrictions amongst intra-division games being "flexed."
I think Atlanta already has 5 prime time games. Actually I went and counted 4 and houston only has 1. Also it's a Texans home game so it's slated for Fox..seems like the guaranteed flex game.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it helps that Bryce and Tmac worked out a bit this off-season before the draft and are familiar with each other's game from way back.  Sure Bryce put in a good word for him to the coaching crew ahead of time That california connection goin' work, I hope
    • Sign but make it mostly incentive driven contract
    • My biggest problem is I think the players he likes don't really work in the modern NFL.  You mentioned the wr room being a lot better, is it?  It has the potential to be.   Last year when we traded up to get Legette, they said they traded up to take him specifically because he was a true X receiver.   Now this year they take TMac because they say he is and that XL was out of posisition last year.  Im not sold on Tmac yet just like I wasn't sold on XL last year.  If TMac isn't a lot better than last XL was last season then that's back to back first rounders in one position that would still need a huge amount of work.  Hopefully Tmac is what everyone seems to think he will be, I'm just not so sure, but them declaring XL was a true X receiver after the draft last year and what they're saying now should at least give you pause about their receivers evaluation because it means they definitely made a mistake one way or another.
×
×
  • Create New...