Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Home/Away schedule through 2017 listed


freebird4181

Recommended Posts

i knew about the rotation.

the thing i wasn't sure about was the home/away games being decided. makes sense, though.

These eight season schedules will take each team through a cycle of games - home and away - against every other team in the league. In these eight seasons, every team will play every other team at least twice - once home and once away. After the 2009 season, a decision will be made on whether to continue with the same rotation or modify it.
link

the problem is, though, are they going to start the rotation over or just continue it? the home and away games could easily be backward or totally different than the way it has been. it is far from a sure thing that it will stay the same.

now after the season is over what is going to happen? that is the problem. do they extend it another year while they try to figure it out? are they going to be able to decide on a schedule rotation in between the 2009 and 2010 season? how long will it take to get that hashed out?

if they manage to extend the season by a couple games...what is that going to do to the rotation? where will those other games come from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i knew about the rotation.

Yeah, it's interesting that you haven't heard ANYTHING from the league regarding extending the current schedule rotation that runs through 2009. I think everyone assumes that 2010 will just start at the same place that we did in 2002.

I think the NFL has held back any official announcement because of this 18 game schedule idea and the current lack of a CBA after the next couple of years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has been one modification, allowing East Coast teams to not have to play in San Diego and Oakland (not sure if this applies to San Fran and Seattle) in the same season.

i think that was just something that kept them from having to be out there 2 weeks in a row.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...