Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The great debate PC vs. Console

NotinbutaPnut

By NotinbutaPnut,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

PantherExpress Proficient

PantherExpress

Posted
Posted

I was a console guy for a long time due to the fact that my PC's were always garbage.

Now will only be on PC starting December 20th because I will be playing Star Wars The Old Republic for the foreseeable future.

Im really looking forward to the old republic. Let me know what/what kind of server u play on, I wonder if there will be a fair amount of huddlers playing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
weymouthst Newbie

weymouthst

Posted
Posted

Currently, PC is ages beyond console. It's basically the technology and numbers, really.

Once the economy gets a boost new consoles will come out, and it will be an even playing field again.

Still, PC will always out perform the console, based on technology. The best experience comes from PC and it always will.

But like others have said, certain games are just better on console, like sports games. The reason I play my FPS's on console is that my friends have consoles, and it is very easy to communicate and party up.

So it all depends, and it is hard to say one is better than the other. Both have pros and cons, but if I had to choose, I would choose PC every time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Porn Shop Clerk Enthusiast

Porn Shop Clerk

Posted
Posted

Psychonauts ftw. That said, I don't view tf2, killing floor or sim city 4 as pushing any boundaries.

How's global agenda?

better than halo. its like a tf2+halo mmo with light rpg elements that focuses mostly on pvp

pretty demanding graphically, runs on the unreal 3 engine

still nothing to write home about

psychonauts is one of the best games nobody has ever played though :(

also you picked 3 games i paid 5 bucks each for

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Porn Shop Clerk Enthusiast

Porn Shop Clerk

Posted
Posted

Currently, PC is ages beyond console. It's basically the technology and numbers, really.

Once the economy gets a boost new consoles will come out, and it will be an even playing field again.

Still, PC will always out perform the console, based on technology. The best experience comes from PC and it always will.

But like others have said, certain games are just better on console, like sports games. The reason I play my FPS's on console is that my friends have consoles, and it is very easy to communicate and party up.

So it all depends, and it is hard to say one is better than the other. Both have pros and cons, but if I had to choose, I would choose PC every time.

i tried playing madden on pc when it still released, but it wasn't that fun

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • KillerKat
      New site coming sooner than planned??

      By KillerKat · Posted

      That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • The Third Reich
      Ikem

      By The Third Reich · Posted

      Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
    • UnluckyforSome
      Sorsby to the supplemental draft

      By UnluckyforSome · Posted

      Supplemental draft uses picks from next year. So a team were to draft him in the 1st, their upcoming 1st next draft would no longer be available. There have been some notable players that were obtained in the supplemental draft, such as Kosar. It doesn't necessarily happen every year either, and is more on a as needed basis. The gambling trouble is a big red flag for teams, and maybe pushes him down to a 4th? Not sure a team would use a 1st on him.
×
×
  • Create New...