Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rivera's Monday Press Conference


Ruff

Recommended Posts

-Rivera says they set the tone early. Kind of snowballed.

-Concerned about the guys on Special Teams not doing their job well enough. Didn't want to answer question about his satisfaction with our ST Coach, but did make excuses for him. Says it's a hard job, especially when you are shuffling players.

-Losing Beast and TD was a huge blow in terms of losing leadership. Cam, 89, Gross, Shock have all stepped up to be leaders-but we lack that defensively.

-Says Connor was a good ST guy, but it isn't doing it now because he's a starter-stuff like that hurts us, though Connor does play punt team.

-Says we played yesterday the way people expected us to play beginning of the year. Have got to handle this adversity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- Asked what happened to the offense that's been running so well, Rivera said they "had the wind taken out of their sail" with the punt return + the fumble in the red zone.

- Said they "felt good about what they wanted to do" against the Titans, but it didn't really work out.

- Rivera said he's "concerned" that the guys that are doing the job aren't doing it well enough.

- Asked if he knows who the leaders are, Rivera said when "you lose a Jon Beason or a Thomas Davis" you lose your leaders, and "you look for someone to step up". Said Cam's a leader, as well as Steve Smith and Shockey.

- Said Dan Connor was supposed to be a full-time special teams player, and now that he starts, it's taken that away.

- Asked if you just take this tape and throw it away, and Rivera emphatically said "No. You take this tape and you learn from it." Said every team has a bad game, and it's "how you bounce back from it".

- Rivera said he was "embarrassed".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- Said the chippiness in the last two minutes of the game was "frustrating", with both teams. Said "when's a games like that, just play it out... Do your job." Said there should be more "pride" in winning and losing.

- Said we're "developing a football team." Have two young DTs "that have played really, really well." Wants the young guys to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

--Yesterday's loss was embarrassing. Penalties, last two minutes, especially. Have got to dig deeper from a character standpoint. This is gut-check time, will be making tough decisions the next 7 weeks, seeing who really wants it. Says it's hard enough to accept losing, even worse with yesterday's case.

--Really upset with how players acted near end of game-Titan's players included.

--Say's 2 young DTs have played well, mentioned Neblett's and Bits by name. Says Keiser played well.

--Mentioned San Fran's quick turn around thanks to their experience.

--Ryan Kalil is fine, Shockey is banged up. Connor got a stinger. but should be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...