Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam's a slam for Rookie of the Year


jtnc

Recommended Posts

Dude what are you smoking? See this is the problem with some of you man. You have no fuging clue what it means to be a real elite veteran versus a damn rookie. You give no freaking credit to experience, learning, refining the position.

AJ and Smith are not even close. And the numbers clearly show. Smith's the #2 receiver in the NFL right now and he's above and beyond even other veteran receivers that have played the game before. AJ isn't even in the top 10. This is what makes Cam Homers like you a laughing stock. You think Cam Newton makes Smith look good. It's pathetic.

And it makes haters like you a damn joke, saying he isn't an efficient passer when he's more efficient than Manning, or Aikman in their rookie years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude what are you smoking? See this is the problem with some of you man. You have no fuging clue what it means to be a real elite veteran versus a damn rookie. You give no freaking credit to experience, learning, refining the position.

AJ and Smith are not even close. And the numbers clearly show. Smith's the #2 receiver in the NFL right now and he's above and beyond even other veteran receivers that have played the game before. AJ isn't even in the top 10. This is what makes Cam Homers like you a laughing stock. You think Cam Newton makes Smith look good. It's pathetic.

because smith made matt moore and clausen look like all pros too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never be an efficient passer? Yeah you were probably in the same crowd who said he never could make it as an NFL QB. Cam has already has a better completion rating and a TD to int ratio than Manning during his rookie year. Both Manning, Marino and Aikman had turnover problems early in their careers.

They had completion pct% of:

58% (Marino)

60% (Cam)

56% (Manning)

52% (Aikman)

And Dalton has more comeback wins because his defense puts him in that situation, most of the time Cam is not even on the field for long periods of time because the defense can't get a stop.

Finally, if you want to keep talking about this fuging red head who doesn't play for the Carolina Panthers, then be a Bengal fan.

Cam has definitely shown more polish as a passer than I expected but it's simply too hard to compare QB stats from 10+ years ago to today. Just look at completion % across the board today. Cam is at 60% and yet that's just 20th in the league. Manning and Marino actually compared better to their peers than Cam does right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And it makes haters like you a damn joke, saying he isn't an efficient passer when he's more efficient than Manning, or Aikman in their rookie years.

Uhm..they weren't efficient passers in their rookie years either. They sucked too! And their teams lost too. Most of those guys were all losers in their rookie years too.

And it ain't just completion percentage. There's more to the QB position than that. There's game managing. There's interceptions. There's sacks. There's knowing when to throw a ball away. There's knowing where to pass. There's situational ratings like in Cam's case the 4th quarter when tied or down.

All of those things added up. But yeah in general rookie QB's suck ass. Only Ben and Dalton have been the only ones worth a damn in their rookie years off the top of my head. Manning was total ass and most Colts fans thought he was never going to make it with as many picks as he threw his first year. They all cost their teams winning seasons.

You think the fact that Manning sucked for a whole year as a rookie is the reason he ended up good later? No. That has nothing to do with it. Most rookies need to sit their asses on a bench where they belong for a year until they can come in and win. It sure as hell didn't hurt Brady or Rodgers by sitting down. It made them better.

Neither one of those guys looked like ass in their first years. They sat on the bench, learned the basics, and got put in when they were ready to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...