Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ok, legit debate (18 game theory)


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

I think it's a load of marketing bullshit Goodell is trying to do here with adding 2 more games on top of the 16 we already have.

Before 78 the 14 games that were there were kind of a little short for a season. IMO 16 is perfect.

Why 18? If only to make more money? These players get hurt, sometimes teams can't last the whole 16 weeks before their roster is depleted and there's a shitload of players on IR.

16 games is good enough, but when you add 2, you're only dragging out the season even more and increasing the possibility of injuries just by having more games, so eventually you can make even more stupid rules in the vein of your golden players (doesn't Brady have like 3 rules made because of himself?)

Here's my idea if you want to extend the season a bit more. 16 games thru 18 weeks. Every team gets 2 bye weeks. I think 3 would be too many, I'm trying to find a balance for teams to get healthy but at the same time not kill their momentum. 18 games is wayyy too much to ask for players to last that long.

but I'd be totally fine with leaving it the way it is with only 1 bye week.

I miss Tagliabue.:(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

adalius thomas owns read this

”For me, the money thing, stop. Just stop. If you want to cry about money, then open your books up to an independent audit to show how much you’re really making,” Thomas said. ”If you really want to cry about money, open your books up, put what you really make in the paper like you put our salaries in the paper every year . . . why don’t you do the same thing?”

”So, the pre-season, let’s do the math. You’re selling tickets at the normal price. You take that, everyone in the locker room is the same, depending on what year you were,” Thomas said. ”Early-year guys get $400-or-$500 dollars (per game). The most you can get is $1,100-$1,200. So you’re telling me, Tom Brady is going to play a regular season game, for $1,200?

”Your ticket prices don’t change for pre-season, so why does our paycheck? Since they’re making all these rule changes. That doesn’t make any sense to me, we already get paid. No, you already get paid. Don’t give me that B.S. I’ve been around too long for that. That’s crazy.”

”I don’t see how it can’t be. Unless you’re going to pay me the way you pay me the other (regular season games), you’re going to have to increase my pay for the two others,” said Thomas, who was the union rep in Baltimore. ”Because in the contract, it says 16-17 regular season games. That’s how your pay is drawn. (the 17th check is for the bye week). So you’re telling me you’re going to add a week, but you’re going to pay me like the pre-season? We’re not doing that. Well, you can mark me down on the injured list for two weeks. You can put that in your books. You done lost your mind. ”

http://www.bostonherald.com/blogs/sports/patriots/index.php/2009/04/03/adalius-thomas-rants-on-rules-and-proposed-added-schedule/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The current CBA allows them to add 2 games I believe. I do agree that if they play 18,they shouldn't get 16 game checks spread over 18 games though. The salaries should be adjusted. Ideally though they would leave it at 16 games. Much as I love the NFL, I don't thik 18 games are a good thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't think any of this will fly unless they increase the salary cap to help pay for the extra games. no way would they agree to it otherwise.

i would rather they extend it by a couple weeks and eliminate a couple preseason games. i hadn't thought of how much the players get paid for those two games but that just adds more fuel to the need to get rid of them. not only is it a meaningless game that they could needlessly get hurt in, it doesn't pay well.

it is going to boil down to taking away two preseason games and picking up 1 more game per team and one more bye week per team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The league has always played 20 games since 1961, when they went to the 14 game season. They played 6 pre-season games then. When they went to the 16 game season, they dropped 2 of the pre-season games. At least if they go to 17 or 18 games, the tickets will be easier to move, assuming that adding 1 or 2 regular games will result in dropping 1 or 2 preseason ones. Most times, you can't even give the preseason games away. With just a couple preseason games, they would mean much more as far as getting the teams ready, and (hopefully) be more 'sellable' by being so. Hopefully!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that the player compensation would have to be worked out. As Thomas was quated, the players are not going to play 18 on a 16 game salary.

But as far as the idea of adding games is concerned I won't mind it. The one thing that needs to change even if the NFL doesn't expand it's season is the addition of roster spots on each team. 53 players isn't enough now IMO with so many injuries. Expanding the season, that number becomes even less adequate. Between the starters, ST players, key reserves and then draftee development players, many teams are forced to let players walk even though they are needed.

As I said I think the roster number needs to increase no matter what but with an expanded season the need only increases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The league has always played 20 games since 1961, when they went to the 14 game season. They played 6 pre-season games then. When they went to the 16 game season, they dropped 2 of the pre-season games. At least if they go to 17 or 18 games, the tickets will be easier to move, assuming that adding 1 or 2 regular games will result in dropping 1 or 2 preseason ones. Most times, you can't even give the preseason games away. With just a couple preseason games, they would mean much more as far as getting the teams ready, and (hopefully) be more 'sellable' by being so. Hopefully!

Great points!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What you are saying isn't always true and I'll give you several examples to demonstrate this. 1) The best player on the board at the end of in round 1 by all consensus is RB (top 15 player in draft who slips b/c of the devaluation of the RB position). Your team is in desperate need of a LT because the current one is getting your QB killed. You already have a serviceable RB in place. The LT has a 2nd round grade and you have the first pick on day 2 of the draft Who do you choose? 2) Your run defense was abysmal the previous season. A DT in round 2 does not provide much in terms of pass rush, but most reports have him rated as the best pure run stuffing DT in the draft. The two highest rated players on your board at the time are a TE and tweener at OLB/DE who slipped into round 2 after a run on WR's. Who do you choose? 3) Your pass rush rush is solid across the board. You even have guy coming off of the bench to provide production. Your secondary in below average. No Safety on the roster is a difference maker and as a unit the squad doesn't have an INT. The highest rated player on the board is a DE. The 5th highest rated player on the board is a an intelligent ball hawking Safety. Which player would make the team immediately better?  1) I think the BPA logic applies when your team is solid across the board and you can afford to draft for depth 2) I think it also applies when your team stinks and any solid player will be an immediate upgrade over what you already have. I agree that you should NEVER reach for a player when you are need at a position like we did for Bryce Young. But I also think if there's is a player on the board that will fill a glaring weakness you need to take him even if a player with a higher over all ranking is available at another position (which isn't a need)  
    • Bryce Young excels at dividing Panthers fans. That seems to be what he's best at.
    • 184 yards game, 61% completion 11 tds 5ints    thats ranks :check notes:  25th in the nfl
×
×
  • Create New...