Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Getting back to 2003


Kurb

Recommended Posts

http://www.carolinagrowl.com/Read.aspx?Story=914

Hurney and Fox knew first and foremost they had to get bigger and better up front.

But there was the matter of taking care of some housework.

They re-signed Travelle Wharton to a huge contract and moved him to left guard, a position many believe fits him better at the NFL level. They tried to re-sign Jordan Gross, but when that deal fell through they made him the franchise player and switched him to left tackle.

To clear cap room they dumped Mike Wahle and Justin Hartwig and made Ryan Kalil, a player they simply couldn’t pass up on in the second round of the 2007 draft, their starting center.

There was still the matter of shoring up the right side of the line.

When free agency began they signed three big linemen – all weighing more than 325 pounds. Although only Keydrick Vincent would stick with the club, he would prove to be an important pickup because of the strength and veteran stability he brought the right guard spot. That would be important because of what the Panthers would do a few weeks later in the draft at the position next to him.

Although many suspected the Panthers would address their glaring need at right tackle with their first pick, Fox and Hurney had another plan in mind.

The Panthers set about finding the right guy not to replace, but to complement the shiftier DeAngelo Williams and Oregon running back Jonathan Stewart just so happened to be the perfect fit.

They held their breath and hoped he’d fall to No. 13 like they thought he would.

And he did.

“We were fortunate that Jonathan was there,” Hurney said. “We knew DeAngelo was talented and improving. But we also knew that when we’d been successful in the past we had two very good running backs.”

The Panthers didn’t have much time to celebrate landing Stewart.

It was onto the phones.

With still a glaring need at right tackle, Hurney found a trade partner in Philadelphia. In a move that reeked to some of desperation at the time, the Panthers pulled the trigger on one of the biggest trades in team history, sending a 2009 first-round draft pick and second- and fourth-round picks in 2008 to the Eagles for the right to move up the 19th spot and take 335-pound road grader Jeff Otah from Pittsburgh.

While some viewed the move as a gamble, nobody is second-guessing the Panthers now.

“We thought very highly of Jeff,” Hurney said. “It was a big investment, yes, but the thing that didn’t make it a gamble for us is that we felt he fit into the formula that had worked here in the past and a formula that fits into our personality. We knew we gave up a lot to get him but he fit into what we wanted to be.”

Just like that, the Panthers had reinvented themselves as a power running team.

They’d gone back to their roots.

Personnally I LOVE powerrunning football.

It's not pretty, but it is manhoodtesting, face ripping off and wearing it like a masking, badass football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Stewert pick surprised me because we had strayed away from the smashmouth style of running downhill in the past few years. That being said, I loved the Otah pick. We all knew the O-line needed work, and I wanted them to pick him up in the first this year. Of course, we've all loved the production of the starting line when they've been healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Top 25 performance based pay in #NFL #Panthers DB Nick Scott made an extra $1.26 million from last year’s campaign, because of the NFL’s Performance-Based Pay program, the league announced today. It was the fourth-highest payout from the program. https://x.com/mike_e_kaye/status/2033598538848862446?s=46
    • BPA!!! Wouldn't life be great if it were that simple?  Need??? To some degree.  I realize that we like life simple:  Instant oatmeal.  self-stick envelopes.  I get it.  BPA people:  Go back and look at teams' needs in prior drafts--even when they scream BPA!, they end up drafting for need.  I guess you should say, "BPA4U" (Best Player Available for Us).  There are many variables. You should know the skill sets for your system.  You should understand your locker room and gauge character.  In my view, another consideration should play into your decision of how you rate a player to be the "best" and the cost of meeting your overall needs.  All needs are not equal.  The talent pool drops off and dries up at different points for different positions.  Each draft is unique.  We have inflation for some positions in free agency, yet the rookie pay scale is based on a formula that is not determined by position or player evaluations:  The 1st overall pick receives the highest salary, with each subsequent pick earning less, regardless of position.  Therefore, if you have seven needs, and three are at positions that pay veterans a ton of money--you should draft those players over those who play positions that would not save you much money.  You have to consider the savings and what that means to the cap as a whole--not just focus on BPA or need. These numbers are based on the average salary of all players and then only the starters by position: Now take a look at what the players make based on the position they are drafted: Sorry they did this in pink.  So let's say the Jets think Sadiq is the BPA on their board with the second pick.  He meets their biggest need, aside from QB, but there are no QBs close to checking the BPA box.  Are you going to pay a rookie TE $13m per year for 4 years ($52m guaranteed)?  According to the chart above, a STARTING TE costs half that.  So Need and BPA are not the only factors (this was an example only). It makes more sense to draft, especially in the first round, a QB, edge, WR, OT, or DT if they are one of your needs and one of the BPAs.  At worst you are getting close to market value if they start.   Looking at the Panthers needs, expected BPAs at #19, and cost vs. what a starting-level free agent makes, we are spending about $5m per year.  Many of us want to draft a S there--if the rookie starts, we'd save about $1.7m per year.  The difference would add a bottom-of-the-roster depth player.  If we drafted a LB, for example, the difference is $1.4m.   I see our needs (right now) as follows:  S, ILB Will, OT, C, TE, and DT.  Of those needs, a veteran starter at OT or DT would save us the most.  For example, an OT veteran who starts averages $13m.  We'd get the player for 4 years (not including the 5th year option for this) and we'd save $8m per year.  To be honest, Walker is an average OT and we got him for a bargain at $10m.  So if we draft an OT, we not only have a starter for next year (regardless of Ickey), we have 2 starting-level LTs on the roster NOW for $15m.  If the OT we draft works out and we do not re-sign Walker, we save $8m x 3 years--$24m.  So the BPA model might be the code you live or die by, but I ask it this way:  Would you rather have a Safety and $1.4m in cap room savings or an OT and $8m per year cap savings?  Both are needs.  Both would be rated in the middle of the draft's first round. The OT and the $8m in savings would get you a starting OT AND the $8m would get you a starting free agency safety, if you think about it. If you step back and see the big picture, use the rookie scale to your advantage, you can improve your roster beyond merely taking the BPA, whatever that means. Looking at the Panther's draft, if they draft OT in round 1, DT in round 2, and both start, they could save about $16m of cap space per year when compared to what average veteran free agents would cost.  LB, C, TE, and S can come later, if you follow this blueprint.   I am not saying that I would draft based solely on this concept, but I am saying that it would be a variable--a big one.   
    • nick just got a bonus-    extra 1,262,216, dang that's a nice bag...
×
×
  • Create New...