Draft analyst still would take QB Luck over Newton

[Herbert The Love Bug]

oh yeah well mycock loves cam. suck it

[The NFL Shield At Midfield]

luck isn't going to be out of this world but he's going to be just good enough to where trolly users on this site can argue that he had a better rookie season than cam.

like he won't have as many total yards or TDs but he'll probably have a slightly higher comp. % or something that's not of overbearing importance to a rookie quarterback. sorry guys

[2jakefansinva]

as a panther fan I could give a sh*t what Luck does in Indy.......

as a football fan I'm sure it's going to forced down my throat. :cam:

[ed bell]

I still dont get the discussion. In the world of reality, proven assets, are always what youre looking for.

A 6'6 260 pound beast who can run sub 4.5 with a howitzer for an arm who has already PROVEN that he doesnt have character issues nor major flaws of any kind. This is why Mayock is a sensationalist like the rest of the jokes at ESPN and NOT a fuggin coach.

Ask the coaches and owners who theyd take and you might get a much more rational answer.

Right on....trouble here is that Mayock can't lose by answering as he did...The question wasn't about a single season performance...just a pure choice if given the option between the two....If Cam replicates last year and Luck doesn't shine right away he'll just put more qualifiers out there....and so on for all scenarios except Cam struggling and Luck lighting it up.

The reality here is that his answer can't be completely analyzed until they both have a significant body of work under their belts. By that time, who will even remember any of these debates? I couldn't care any less right now....I can't imagine how much I won't give a fug a couple years from now...Stop the madness....

[megadeth078]

The truth here is that Mayock didn't like Cam before the draft, and he's just being stubborn.

There's really nothing else to it. You guys are thinking too hard.