Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone else impressed with this Wylie kid?


Shermdog

Recommended Posts

I just don't like spending another pick on a WR, unless you are trying to get Smith's replacement.

If we draft this guy, we will have taken five receivers in the middle rounds in the past three drafts. (Lafell, Gettis, Edwards, Pilares, Wylie).

At some point, we need to start addressing the defense in the later rounds (especially this year). We have enough talent to sustain us at the receiver position for the next 2-3 years (Smith, Lafell, Gettis (?), Olsen, Shockey (?)). Even if Gettis is not the same and shockey doesn't come back, we can pick up a vet on the market that knows the position and can contribute better than a late round rookie would ever contribute (with the exception being a guy like Colston who was athletically freakish)

If we continue to take flyers on receivers, we are neglecting building depth on defense and we will continue to have the pains of watching guys like Jordan Pugh get toasted by Greg Jennings for a 50+ yard TD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nope Still missing it. Let's try this a different way... You have two quarterbacks from schools that ran the same kind of offense - maybe even two from the same school - on a given team (not necessarily the Panthers). One is designated the starter while the other is named the backup. Why?
    • yeah, pretty sure boss.....when things match and fit in the NFL.....the results then show it.  and when they don't, well, the results show that as well.  Bryce doesn't fit.   *but I get why late season and wants to argue with everyone Mr. Scot has also turned into a please don't talk to me about stats guy as well.  Given, the stats that reflect offensive productivity work against all your present arguments. 
    • Yeeeah...stats and rankings have zero to do with a discussion of scheme and skill set match. Maybe look up definitions of style vs ability and see if that helps. At this point, you've basically had three different people explain to you where you're wrong, but rather than addressing any of those statements, you're just resorting to straight deflection.  You don't get it. Either that or you're acting like you don't get it so that you can avoid the discussion because it's not going well for you. (that wouldn't surprise me either) 😄 Sme result either way, I suppose.
×
×
  • Create New...