Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Recommended Posts

I'm confident a rebrand wont happen from people I know within the Bobs. But if it did, and they became a watered down Hornets, my interest would wane. The whole purpose of the rebrand is to faze out fans like myself who've been down since day 1 and say the last 10 years meant nothing and start anew with casual fans who werent. I don't support that, so thats pretty much the only way I'd stop supporting the Bobs. If they sold us out to gain new fans who might or might not support it.

Isn't that the definition of fair weathered fan?? "On board until they do something I don't like then my interest will wane".

I have been on board with the Bobcats since day 1 also, but a re-branding is something several franchises have done with great success.

Look at the Cavaliers before Lebron. As soon as they drafted him they changed their uniforms, color scheme, floor design, etc. They didn't change their name but they re-branded to capitalize on the energy of the arrival of Lebron to give the feeling of a new era in Cavaliers basketball.

Things are a little bit trickier here. The name Bobcats has a stain on it that many people can't get past (I am not one of them but I know too many people who feel that way). If we get the number 1 pick and select Unibrow we will be in a prime position to re-vitalize interest in the NBA in Charlotte. What better way to do that than re-branding.

At the end of the day it is about what energizes and reinvigorates a fan base. In other words, gets people to the coliseum and put butts in the seats. As long as they remain the Bobcats I fear that we would have to be a legit NBA championship contender in order to do that (easier said than done in a small market). Otherwise, a certain contingency won't pay attention just like they didn't two years ago when we were in the playoffs.

Yes. Winning cures all ills. But how much winning will solve the problem. We just went to the playoffs two years ago and still had some of the worst attendance in the NBA. We won. We had MJ as the owner. The people of Charlotte still didn't embrace the team. Because they are the "Bobcats".

In a lot of ways this reminds me of those restaurant rescue shows like "Kitchen Nightmares". You always have the owner of the restaurant that says something like "...if I make this change I will lose my regulars!!" To which Gordon Ramsey would reply something like "Are those regulars making you money or are you headed for bankruptcy and shutting the restaurant down??"

Change is a good thing, and in this case, quite possibly the only thing that can save the franchise short of an appearance in the NBA finals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Changing your jerseys and colors scheme is not the same as rebranding. There's never been an NBA team to rebrand to a previous/existing franchise. Change is good, which is why I accept the Bobs today over the Hornets 20 years ago. What thee catch the buzz movement is about to do is erase the Hornets completely from the NBA. We will remain the Cats while NO rebrands to a "new" (not to be confused with rehash) logo and name.

The Bobs are not gonna gentrify themselves and alienate their diehards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Changing your jerseys and colors scheme is not the same as rebranding. There's never been an NBA team to rebrand to a previous/existing franchise. Change is good, which is why I accept the Bobs today over the Hornets 20 years ago. What thee catch the buzz movement is about to do is erase the Hornets completely from the NBA. We will remain the Cats while NO rebrands to a "new" (not to be confused with rehash) logo and name.

The Bobs are not gonna gentrify themselves and alienate their diehards.

So let me get this straight, King:

You'd rather the B**Cats stay the course, continue to draw somewhere in the 4,000 range, and continue to hemorrhage funds than to do something that just might inspire the other 14,000 'fair weather/bandwagon/wine-and-cheesers/insert KT-coined-personal insult here' to pull out their wallets and show up to a game or 41.

Is that what I'm hearing?

You'd run the risk of losing the team in 5-10 years all in the name of catering to the 'diehards'?

Sounds kinda selfish to me.

P.S. - Teeray: you're really, really good at this :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ever since this forum started people have been implying the end is near. Here we are 8 years later still goin strong. Go Bobs Go! We're not the Hornets, we will be in Charlotte for the long haul. But thanks for the final death blow to the Hornets. Once NO scraps em, the past will finally remain in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ever since this forum started people have been implying the end is near. Here we are 8 years later still goin strong. Go Bobs Go! We're not the Hornets, we will be in Charlotte for the long haul. But thanks for the final death blow to the Hornets. Once NO scraps em, the past will finally remain in the past.

We get outdrawn by our minor league hockey team.

We're literally the single worst team in NBA history.

We lose $20 Million a season.

Just what part of things is 'going strong', King?

I gotta say, I respect the hell out of your resiliency. Once one aspect of your argument is thoroughly debunked/eviscerated, you just mold it into something else (I'm loving the latest remix...we're somehow "killing the Hornets brand for good"...that kind of spin takes talent, sir; you're the T-1000 of angry internet message boarders). But really, man...are you just unwilling to admit that there is a fundamental disconnect with this franchise and the community? I'm not asking you this because I think you're a proxy for any larger group of malcontents - we're pretty much operating with the approval ratings of a 1950's Banana Republic dictator at this point - I'm asking because I'm worried about you, individually. Listen...it's looking more and more like this is going to happen. I just don't want you to do anything drastic when it does ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

did someone just suggest that attendance per game would boost by 14000 if they rebranded to the hornets?

seriously?

I believe it was something to the effect of "(a rebrand) MIGHT inspire the other 14000 fans that aren't there to come out for a game or 41". But we all know that you knew that, Porn. I know how pesky that little 'quote' button can be when you're trying to twist words, but come on...you can do better than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actual attendance, King. Bodies in seats. You and I both know it happens. However, I'll concede: that's an anecdotal tidbit and if I had any shred of journalistic integrity, I'd have omitted it. My apologies.

Care to address the other actual, tangible issues?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is "fundamental disconnect with the community"? You need to be clear. These arguments you are making are subjective, and it seems like the end goal is being the Hornets, poof all our problems solved. I dont hear you discussing talent, game play, or how being the Hornets is gonna make Chris Paul want to play for us or Dwight Howard. Just saying "being the Hornets brings you $$$$" is weak when the Horbets themselves arent happy or making $$$ being the Hornets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hell even the "free sean peyton" movement got jimmy buffet behind it.

the charlotte hornets movement only matters to the 30 or so people pushing for it

i think its more likely that you're living in a bubble

Your 'argument' has no teeth, so you resort to insults.

Digging your own grave there, Porn.

(And for the record, we have just a couple more than 30 people on board. Just a couple :) )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Specifics?!?

There are 16 pages on this thread tearing everything you just said apart, King. Of course we're concerned with personnel issues. Of course we don't think a rebrand is a silver bullet...blah blah blah. It just doesn't end with you. Foolish of me to wade back into the cesspool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...