Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

5 Questions Which We Should Get Answered By Saturday....


sml1950

Recommended Posts

1. We MUST stop the run. Will this heal itself with Beason, Davis, Edwards, Fua and McClain returning from injury, or do we have to take a chance on Poe clogging up the middle?

2. If we are comfortable at runstopping, what other DL best fits our scheme? Cox at the 3 technique who can play 5 and 7. Couples at the 7 who could play 3 or 5. Ingram at the 7 and 9 who could play the 3 or OLB? The DE must be able to step back in coverage when the back seven blitzes. Which of these players do this effectively?

3. How much smoke was Hurney blowing when he signed Tolbert to play Fullback? Will the Broncos, Giants, Pats, Jets, etc. make an offer for JStew that we can't refuse?

4. If we continue to run the fast break offense, do we have enough speed at WR to take away double teams from Smitty? Is Gettis the man or do we have to add another high pick weapon?

5. This is the year of the ST. Is it time to move on from AE and get a new KR?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...