Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Now That It Has Simmered For A While...


carolinarolls

Recommended Posts

In my opinion the first round tells us all a little more than we knew. I was shocked when I did not hear Goodell say "Fletcher Cox" when he marched to the podium with our pick. I am on the outside looking in though and from where I sit, I saw DL as our biggest issue. The exact same (incorrect) feeling I had last year when we drafted Cam. Anyway, it looks like LB, MLB at that, is a bigger concern. Achilles injuries are almost impossible to fully recover from, at least to the same point athletically where you were. TD has some IR issues to say the least and Connor is gone. Seems like a no brainer now. I was under the impression however and truly hoped that JB and TD were solid. I really feel that Anderson is solid. Apparently they are not as convincing as we all hope. If these assumptions are fair, Kuechly was clearly the best pick.

Or maybe this means that Fua and McClain are looking much better than they did as rookies. Maybe they have inspired enough confidence to allow Hurney and Riv to take a safe pick and stockpile a position. It would not be that big of a shock if they have. Both have the measurables to compete and the majority of picks after 60 get at least year of leeway to mature.

Understanding that, the 2nd round pick is too high to go BPA without limits. I think we have to stick to the Defense and the pick should be a corner or an end. How Hurney and Rivera feel about the readiness of Hogan as well as the maturation of Hardy/Applewhite in the system could be revealed a little with this pick.

I am hoping for an end myself because our pass rush is slack at best and I think defense begins and ends with pressure on the QB. Coverage, good coverage, is all too often negated by the zebras. Corners are just too limited. When the ball is in the air and on target, its usually too late to worry about how good your corners are because if the play is close we are likely to see yellow. Of the two positions, and taking into consideration the phantom rushing the passer and blow to the head plays, I believe more disruption can come from the ends than anywhere else.

So who is the most disruptive end we could get today?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Picking Kuechly says less about Beason than it does about Davis. I think Beason will be fine; it's Davis that they've essentially given up on with this pick. People don't realize how good Kuechly is if they think he's just a MLB. He can play outside. He's not Dan Connor; he's a much better athlete with coverage skills as good (if not better) than Davis/Anderson/Beason and is much faster/quicker than Connor.

My guess is Beason stays inside, Anderson plays strongside, and Kuechly plays weakside. Davis is cut after camp, starts the season and gets hurt, or is kept as a backup and cut before his roster bonus hits next March. Maybe an outside chance he stays healthy and starts all season and is then let go, but that's a long shot. I've never felt he could come back at full strength if at all from 3 ACL tears.

Beason will be fine. We've seen the video evidence of his recovery and even if he's not the Beason of old this year, he'll be damn close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely a good write up, OP. I have to disagree on one point though. I don't think the selection says anything more about their satisfaction with Fua/McClain than it does Hardy/other DEs. If you're gonna say "well Cox was a better prospect so that gives passing up on him for Kuechly more weight", they had Coples in for a second interview right before the draft. I think it's safe to say if Kuechly wasn't there at #9, Coples would be a Panther. Someone, somewhere mentioned Kuechly was their #1 prospect on the whole board. Can't remember who, don't know if it was a credible claim, but I just have to believe that Kuechly was just so far above all other prospects in their eyes that they passed on more obvious needs like DT or DE.

Where I'm going with this is here - I think our 2nd round pick should be Devon Still (God I hope he's available) or Jerel Worthy. Vinny Curry might be good but I think Still and Worthy are EASILY safer picks and if picking Kuechly has indicated anything, it's that they're playing it safe. If they're going to gamble at all with this pick, it'll be on someone with much higher potential in Jenkins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BPA. No reaching or drafting for need. When teams do this they end up drafting a Bruce Irvin or a Weeden or a Armanti Edwards or a Everette Brown! I hope Hurney has learned his lesson with those two. What I would like to see is more emphasis on skill and less on character. I'm not saying ignore character issues but rather look for skill first and foremost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...